The Petrified Tome — Word Like Rock

100% Psyche

#n01 Soth

Modern philosophy, far from understanding the human condition, manages to explain humans away almost entirely.
A soulless, joyless rationale so devoid of anything human or anything tangible, it almost makes one long for the miraculous and embrace the magical.

#n01.02

Existence most universally or generally is the sacredly farcical tome of fundamentalistically bigoted gravitas that humans are in a universe and part of it (by definition "everything," therefore, "the universe") that exists.

#n01.03

Such universe as everything that is, is therefore "the universe."

#n01.04

The abysmal nonsense is that the universe is practically infinite and accordingly, that humans are vanishingly small (infinitesimal) in it or part of it.

#n01.05

Such universe includes all things and everything, even non-existent or "abstract" and "spiritual" things.

#n01.06

It includes nothing, non-existence, multiverses or superverses, life, afterlife, spirit worlds, god-worlds and God, God's word, mythology, narrative and fake mainstream media news.

#n01.07

Point-i is the utterly true point that everything is human, which is word.

#n01.08

It is not something or someone other's human or word by which the abysmal farce "it is" (existence) by which humans, "how pathetic are they," cannot understand the nose of the bear or the eyes of the eagle.

#n01.09

Yet those phrases are sheer human. It is what everything is. Word.

#n01.10

No, the point is not that humans use and have word, but that of all things, humans are by a very long shot most prototypically word.

#n01.11

What kind of question is it that #n01.06 above implies "no life?" Not in the feintest does the comment imply that there is not life or that there is life. The point is that "life" or anything (utterly word) to explain word as if that explanation is not word, is the error.

#n01.12

(No life?)Soth de Witan , "life" exactly the meaning here as intended is not "life"Point-i. Not in the least.

#n01.13

Also, the words boxed Pierre Rousseau are not driven by some psyche-derivative crap. That explanation is the psychologism, namely what every brutality is.

#n01.14

"No life?" = "Are YOU saying there is no life? Wtf is wrong with you... blablabla."

#n01.15

Not that serious, apparently, for one must have a good sense of humor,... which is another can of metaphorical worms, chronically unpacking blablabla.

#n01.16

The idiocy is the idea that humans are doing all that, whatever all that is, and are idiots.

#n01.17

All ideology, whether demonstratively cleansed of its fundamentalist bigotry God or otherwise or not is bullshit.

#n01.18

Ideology, and all deductive logic in support of that and other knowledge "about" things, namely in support of "the evidence" (inductive logic).

#n01.19

The latter what Soth de Witan FEELS Pierre Rousseau is saying, the full extent of the emotion that the motion is, of the abysmal nonsense that the infinite ocean wordlessly explains everything.

#n01.20

What is the holy abyss, is the error that "there is" [something behind (around or in)] something that explains what it is indirectly.

#n01.21

Yet all that it ever is (in terms of such crap), is anything other than that. Hence the infinite ocean is the abyss.

#n01.22

Existence is the explanation that is the abyss.

#n01.23

All such explanations East and West are bullshit.

#n01.24

AND THAT INCLUDES NON-EXISTENCE, NON-LIFE, OR NON-WHATEVER CREATIONIST OR EXISTENTIALIST.

#n01.25

Same for "not creating." "You not doing, 1, 2, 3,... n" is supposed to be what I'm suggesting. Abysmal strawman squarely in and as the bullshit and bullshitting world of creation and existence.

#n01.26

The infinite ocean of enlightenment to which the many paths lead is fullness in terms of "mind," yes.

#n01.27

But "mind" is "transcendent" stuff outside or inside. Homunculus. Or God in the Machine.

#n01.28

The Bullshit of the Chicken and the Egg

Of the order of such mythological crap, masculine bullshit (the great father—creation) is only transcended for the purported fullness of the hollowness of the abyss by the feminine bullshit (the great mother—existence). It is the bullshit of the chicken and the egg.

#n01.29

So, it is only now by chance that the second is worse, because it is developmentally what is unfurling its metastatic network-mushroom cloud, as the implosion of everything.

#n01.30

The error is that word is but some kind of semetic infinitesimal approaching consummate holiness, nothingness/existence.

#n01.31

Everything is word. Only in the total idiocy-world beyond word explaining it in words as if it is infinitely greater than words, does that then mean that it presumes to be everything-GodAndGodsWord.

#n01.32

Such idiocy is utterly mind-blowing, and since the story is words are in mind, the implosion of word.

#n01.33

It is not mind-filling. It is no ocean. It is the abyss.

#n01.34

It is in terms of the idiocy existence itself that everything is such lies and that humans are the idiots responsible for it.

#n01.35

The East is the error that in contrast to such human idiocy, that it is human idiocy is some kind of oceanic wisdom.

#n01.36

So, also the East is the indirect rationalization of existence as the answer to the questions how and why word.

#n01.37

It is not human idiocy. It is the idiocy that it is human idiocy.

#n01.38

Whether the claim is that the ocean says it (East) or that the molecules say it (West), the idiocy is the idea existence, namely that word is human idiocy.

#n01.39 — Soth

There is no objective reality. There is no subjective reality. There is only word. All words seeking to explain subject or object or suggesting agency are non-word?

↓ #n02

#n02

Yes. Existence (yin) and creation (yang) explain away humans entirely, as one energy,... existence.

#n02.01

The infinite ocean is nothingness or the integration of infinitesimals. It doesn't matter what form such infinitesimals bullshit takes, e.g., the infinite inner superverse fractal self-similarity of quanta.

#n02.03

The illusion of agency is such (illusory), yes. And it is delusory, by the litany of psychological fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder as the attribution of existence and agency to humans as being [mere subjects-minion or objects-token] of the supposed farce of their supposed subjective objectivity.

#n02.04

All a fucking paradoxical joke, the bullshit solution. But it is holy, for it is existence.

#n02.05

The point that mana is involved, with drive or judgment, rather than that nonword word as if with mana is the error (self-contradiction) that is the mayhem.

#n02.06

The vMeme Americana is not as bad as the VMeme Social Justice trying to usurp it.

#n02.07

2n-tier mana is the 2nd VMeme Chaos. It is the Dragon.

#n02.08

Point-i is only psyche as the idea that it is psyche. The bullshit story.

#n02.09

Social Justice is The Great Mother as Americana is The Great Father.

#n02.10

The traditional first world (the West) is yang as the third world is yin.

#n02.11

Social justice is sheer yin. Not that yang is right whatsoever.

#n02.12

Yin is trying to stir up next-tier yang juices to appropriate it for itself.

#n02.13

V (cancer, 1st tier or metastasis, 2nd tier) is the yin yang paradox supposedly enlightenment, holy or woke.

#n03 — Soth

What about the hermetic principle of polarity? "Everything is dual; everything has poles; everything has its pair of opposites; like and unlike are the same; opposites are identical in nature but different in degree; extremes meet; all truths are but half-truths; all paradoxes may be reconciled."

Is that the same kind of b/s?

#n03.01

The problem with polarity is its fundamentalistic role in the existentialist or psychologistic bigotry on which human agency necessarily with scapegoating rides.

#n03.02

To revert to my user experience, I am enamored of evolution, but I also sense that it cannot be right. There must be a mistake.

#n03.03

It [polarity] seems to suggest that there is a middle way....some 'truth' that is neither yin nor yang, left nor right, this nor that, world vs me, etc.

#n03.04

The middle way only extends and consolidates each developmental level of fundamentalist bigotry to ever more complex relationships to a dead end unity God-paradox, that nothingness is everything.

#n03.05

Instead of that everything is word, and therefore that the idea that word is everything, even if such everything is nothingness, is the bullshit that is the mayhem every step of the way, proscribed by some transcendent experiential practice.

#n03.06 Soth

Not necessarily. One does not have to subscribe to any kind of religious or dogmatic practice to see some 'truth' in that principle.

#n03.07 Soth

You have stated previously that everything is word, but word is not everything. Does that mean that every 'thing' must be word, and that there are things that are yet to be 'labelled' (new ideas)?

#n03.08

By valuing the middle way one does have to subscribe to psychology, the world of some submissive agentive transformation, whether by or to drives.

#n03.09

[By the middle way] One is immediately subjective, objective, subject or object of something bigger than oneself.

#n03.10 Soth

It seems that the entire human story is bullshit. Word has no significance whatsoever, except the story we concoct?

#n03.11

Everything is word. Utterly.

#n03.12

That humans have and do the story, as in concocting it, is the concoction by which human is dismal token object or slave subject.

#n03.13 Soth

I'm back to 'I don't exist'.

#n03.14

You're too petrified not to revert to the frivolous words of the world of existence. User illusion by the autocratic psychologistic intimidation of millennia.

#n03.15

Word like rock.