Recent Changes - Search:

edit SideBar

Books / Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language
Umberto Eco
→ Pi
Note ix Introduction 1 1. Signs 14 1.1. Crisis of a concept 14 1.2. The signs of an obstinacy 15 1.3. Intension and extension 18 1.4. Elusive solutions 18 1.5. The deconstruction of the linguistic sign 20 1.5.1. Sign vs. figura 20 1.5.2. Signs vs. sentences 21 1.5.3. The sign as difference 23 1.5.4. The predominance of the signifier 24 1.5.5. Sign vs. text 24 1.5.6. The sign as identity 25 1.6. Signs vs. words 26 1.7. The Stoics 29 1.8. Unification of the theories and the predominance of linguistics 33 1.9. The 'instructional' model 34 1.10. Strong codes and weak codes 36 1.11. Abduction and inferential nature of signs 39 1.12. The criterion of interpretability 43 1.13. Sign and subject 45 2. Dictionary vs. Encyclopedia 46 2.1. Porphyry strikes back 46 2.1.1. Is a definition an interpretation? 46 2.1.2. The idea of a dictionary 47 2.1.3. The interpretation of the markers 54 2.2 Critique of the Porphyrian tree 57 2.2.1. Aristotle on definition 57 2.2.2. The Porphyrian tree 58 2.2.3. A tree which is not a tree 61 2.2.4. The tree is entirely made up with differentiae 64 2.2.5. Differentiae as accidents and signs 67 2.3. Encyclopedias j 68 2.3.1- Some attempts: registering contexts and topics 68 2.3.2. Some attempts: registering frames and scripts 70 2.3.3- Some attempts: stereotypes and commonsense knowledge 73 2.3.4. Clusters 78 2.3.5. The encyclopedia as labyrinth 80 2.3.6. The dictionary as a tool 84 3. Metaphor 87 3.1. The metaphoric nexus 87 3.2. Traditional definitions 89 3.3. Aristotle: synecdoche and Porphyrian tree 91 3.4. Aristotle: metaphors of three terms 92 3.5. Aristotle: the proportional scheme 94 3.6. Proportion and condensation 96 3.7. Dictionary and encyclopedia 97 3.8. The cognitive function 99 3.9. The semiosic background: the system of content 103 3.9.1. The medieval encyclopedia and analogia entis 103 3.9.2. Tesauro's categorical index 105 3.9.3. Vico and the cultural conditions of invention 107 3.10. The limits of formalization 109 3.11. Componential representation and the pragmatics of the text 112 3.11.1. A model by 'cases' 112 3.11.2. Metonymy 114 3.11.3. 'Topic', frames', isotopies 117 3.11.4. Trivial metaphors and 'open' metaphors 118 3.11.5. Five rules 123 3.11.6. From metaphors to symbolic interpretation 124 3.12. Conclusions 127 4. Symbol 130 4.1. Genus and species 134 4.2. Expressions by ratio facilis 136 4.2.1. Symbols as conventional expressions 136 4.2.2. Symbols as expressions conveying an indirect meaning 136 4.3. Expressions produced by ratio difficilis 137 4.3.1. Symbols as diagrams 137 4.3.2. Symbols as tropes 139 4.3.3. The Romantic symbol as an aesthetic text 141 4.4. The symbolic mode 143 4-4.1. The Hegelian symbol 143 4.4.2. Archetypes and the Sacred 144 4.4.3. The symbolic interpretation of the Holy Scriptures 147 4.4.4. The Kabalistic drift 153 4.5. Semiotics of the symbolic mode 156 4.6. Conclusions 162 5. Code 164 5.1. The rise of a new category 164 5.1.1. A metaphor? 164 5.1.2. Dictionaries 165 5.2. The landslide effect 166 5.3. Codes and communication167 5.4. Codes as s-codes 169 5.4.1. Codes and information 169 5.4.2. Phonological code 169 5.4.3. Semantics-codes 171 5.5. Cryptography and natural languages 172 5.5.1. Codes, ciphers, cloaks 172 5.5.2. From correlation to inference 173 5.5.3. Codes and grammars 175 5.6. S-codes and signification 177 5.6.1. S-codes cannot lie 177 5.6.2. S-codes and institutional codes 179 5.7. The genetic code 182 5.8. Toward a provisional conclusion 185 6. Isotopy 189 6.1. Discursive isotopies within sentences with paradigmatic disjunction 193 6.2. Discursive isotopies within sentences with syntagmatic disjunction 194 6.3. Discursive isotopies between sentences with paradigmatic disjunction 195 6.4. Discursive isotopies between sentences with syntagmatic disjunction 195 6.5. Narrative isotopies connected with isotopic discursive disjunctions generating mutually exclusive stories 196 6.6. Narrative isotopies connected with isotopic discursive disjunctions that generate complementary stories 198 6.7. Narrative isotopies connected with discursive isotopic disjunctions that generate complementary stories in each case 199 6.8. Extensional isotopies 200 6.9. Provisional conclusions 201 7. Mirrors 202 7.1. Is the mirror image a sign? 202 7.2. The imaginary and the symbolic 203 7.3. Getting in through the Mirror 204 7.4. A phenomenology of the mirror: the mirror does not invert 204 7.5. A pragmatics of the mirror 207 7.6. The mirror as a prosthesis and a channel 208 7.7. Absolute icons 210 7.8. Mirrors as rigid designators 211 7.9. On signs 213 7.10. Why mirrors do not produce signs 216 7.11. Freaks: distorting mirrors 217 7.12. Procatoptric staging 219 7.13. Rainbows and Fata Morganas 221 7.14. Catoptric theaters 221 7.15. Mirrors that 'freeze' images 222 7.16. The experimentum crucis 226

Word /

Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language


Author: Umberto Eco

Summary

Introduction

  1. The sign (Saussure) is a correlation between a signifier and signified or between an expression and a content, an interaction of pairs, a dyad.
  2. Semiosis (Peirce) is a triad. It is an action (operation) of three subjects, like a sign, its object and its interpretant, and is unresolvable to pairs interaction.
Quote“The sign is the origin of the semiosic processes, and there is no opposition between the 'nomadism' of semiosis (and of interpretive activity) and the alleged stiffness and immobility of the sign. The concept of sign must be disentangled from its trivial identification with the idea of coded equivalence and identity; the semiosic process of interpretation is present at the very core of the concept of sign. [it is the sign]”—Umberto Eco, p.1 par.2 Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language.

Point-i is the idea that the sign is like semiosis but not reference or process. The sign is unresolvable as action between or of elements and is point-geometry, and thus symbol, whether it is the so-called “natural” (relative) icon, index or symbol. It is analog rather than digital three dimensions. It is singular form, but as the point and the meaning word, and word is human.

The escalating communist demonization of humanity by emotionally diversionary strategies and objectives is the error of action, the subject-object dichotomy or yin-yang paradox error, and is the word metastasis that is the mayhem.

Edit - History - Print - Recent Changes - Search
Page last modified on November 04, 2021, at 03:48 PM