Friday 31

913

Critical theory as liberation from capitalist oppression is oppression next tier.

The result is statism, namely fascism or communism, as the dice rolls.

554

Delusion

Delusion is the error agency as persons and personification, which is the idea that things are not word, but are beyond word, and in action, and that word is a mere sign for things.

Delusion is the dynamic form of agency, namely a narrative of mutual attack of humans on each other for being the ones who have the delusion or are deluded. Such attack is in terms of fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder as accusation of fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder.

Thursday 30

955

The imaginary is open season

The imaginary track and its backtrack are mutually open to psychological projection.

The imaginary beyond the point that word is, is not only open to the self-deception psychological projection. It is open season to humans on each other, by every fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder.

Sunday 26

1407

Continuing Positive, negative and imaginary dimensions

Friday 31

554

Saturday 25

1427

Number as metaphor, namely nomenon or word.

The natural is to the origin* as the integer is to the natural, the rational to the integer, the real to the rational and the complex to the real, and so on.

* Any null, whether integer, rational, real or complex is the origin or imaginary that is the point, motion or word that existence is.

1420

• An imaginary is a point.
• An imaginary squared is a negative
• A negative and its positive equivalent each squared are the same positive, i.e., an equivalent virtual plane
  • A negative cubed is a negative volume (other)
  • A positive cubed is a positive volume (self)
    • A negative cubed times negative time is positive spacetime
    • A positive cubed times positive time is positive spacetime

Continued: Positive, negative and imaginary dimensions

1350

If the point or motion is time, existence is now. Everything other than time is equally a point, i.e., point or word-i to every possible extension. Determination is virtual. Everything, every possible past and future, is deterministic, but virtually so.

Mind or consciousness is not what someone does or has. Mind or consciousness is the virtual determinacy that the past and future are—as the imaginary (i), that is, word-i.

1325

The i component is never absent, ad infinitum. n is virtual in the sense that it is imaginary, and since everything is virtual the idea that it is actually operational is redundant. The idea that someone is operational or not with imagination or not is redundant.

Everything is imaginary, is i, and that include everyone as well.

1259

Everything is the point, word-i. Therefore real numbers (the numbers n) are nothing but imaginary numbers (i). The error is that it is complex and thereby more than i.

Of course such error is "poetic inversion of word-i," namely that the component i is what renders n operational, which obfuscates the bullshit of operation in that the convention is that n is imprecise as referencing 'operational complexity'.

The error is that n is contradiction and farcical paradox in its differentiation from i, that is, point or word-i.

1239

Existence is the point-i, word.

Everything is substantial, and is as such strictly imaginary (number) i.

The error is that it is (someone's) perception (imagination).

1148

A new version of this post (changed or not) ... The alternative to word-i.

The alternative to word-i (that the ideas force and action are absolute error) is that things are in action, but only proverbially as a matter of the resolution of things in terms of spacetime. The action is virtual and the virtual past and future absolutely determine the point and word that now is, in other words that there is utterly no free will—and that animosity between people is redundant.

context: Monday Jan 20 15h18 — click the wheel of your mouse to open in new window.

So, Living Without Free Will, Peerboom is relevant.

1130

The action verb is the error.

Existence as non-word, i.e., that there is and that there is not something is error as the idea that 'exists' is an action verb, that 'exist' is what something that is there or not does or not. The error is that anything does something or not. What is true is that everything is word. 'There' (like everything else) is a word as a thing. It is as things A and B that someone (A) is there (B). Both A and B are specific or general.

Friday 24

1915

'Human nature' is not the error. Nature (word-as-not-word) is the error.

1904

"Look at the flower and the flower also looks."

The action verb confusion is not gone. All interchange, inside or outside is the error. Action verb is the error that is the mayhem. The error is the idea first that anything is not word and then that word is mere reference to some non-word referent.

Looking is the error. Look is a thing. That the flower is look and someone is look are the one thing, two things.

1854

Wikipedia: Hua Tou

Hua tou as the true point beyond which speech exhausts itself is the idea that everything is point, motion and word and that speech or thought is not engaged in action as to exhaust itself or not. Any definition that they are, is the error.

True hua tou is word point (word-i or wi), not word head or head of speech. The idea thought or speech, namely that word is what something (especially word itself) does or has is the error.

Word-i is the idea that everything is point-dimension, mathematical imaginary number (not imagined), and virtual. All assumptions of other kinds of numbers as a position on any integral scale are arbitrary convention. They are contradiction. The idea that they are someone's Great Doubt (confusion, or mayhem), or that getting over them is one's enlightenment is the error that is the mayhem. It is the mayhem as the autocratic catechisms of mindful (mental) usefulness: fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder.

1717

It is current as the error that it is in action. It is current, or event, which is contradiction, but it nevertheless is what everything is, and it is escalating as such. Even though it is a point, i.e., word.

1717

I to we, to I is the oscillation of the vMeme spiral, which is what autocratic hierarchy is. The pc green revolution etc. is blatantly mendacious diversion and euphemism as the Nietzschean lie to power. It is the idea that something is actual, which is utter error so it is a deliberate regression to Nothing. Truly fatally junkie.

1711

The idea that the abolishment of 'action' should be slow is not in the least a call for any revolutionary or counter-revolutionary subversion. It is the idea that the error that agency is, is clear on its own terms—that every venomous (abysmal) addiction is the error and specifically the contradiction that agency is... particularly as the mythic longing for the abyss.

1652

The idea that the head should be chopped off is the metastatic endgame. It is not a mere king whose head rolls. It is the erasure of word. The progressivist infiltration is increasingly in terms of farce. It is no clarity. It is the endgame of utter contradiction. It doesn't give a damn for the disenfranchised. Every liberal story is a diversionary mendacity. The ultimate goal is totalitarian technocracy, i.e., neo-communism. Which is the worst kind of agency. And by the way, it is not planned as such. It is the error 'action' in current, on course.

1652

Well, only because (as the error of what it currently is) it requires slow, rather than fast thinking.

So its abolishment must be slow, i.e., conservative.

The exponential escalation of meaning is the error action under way.

Yes, it is invariably a point, but the point is contradiction. The goal should be, while it is underway (as contradiction), the reduction of contradiction, instead of the embrace of farce as holy.

1641

Progress and therefore progressivism is the deepening of the disease and vMeme autocracy type doctrine of mass incitement is the metastasis.

1632

Every non-word set of 'concepts' sums up to null. I have known for decades this escalating worldly confusion is where we were headed,—as the utmost error that we are agents, or explorers on a journey of discovery en route to somewhere else for the theory of everything (toe). It is the only logical conclusion. That everything is word is no actual integral. It is that everything as word is a point of whatever it is. It is not about something. It is not a theory. It is not a toe.

1619

The idea that we exist, rather than 'exist' is a thing, and that we do not do it or have, but is it, if that is the point. The idea that we are playing or in action in something or on something is the error that is the mayhem.

Word is everything that it is, even contradiction, but contradiction, e.g., action, consciousness and mind are word-as-not-word, which is chronic or synchronic fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder.

And koan farce is certainly not the ground either. That there is any kind of ground beyond word is the bullshit.

1607

Word is not a source or ground. That it is, is exactly the metastatic extension of the error by personification.

The only valid would-be extra-word entity is point, and 'now' is only one such point, namely the point that time is. It is not even infinitesimally integral beyond word.

So, any process, turns of path and so on and the ground or medium on or in which it plays out are the error of extra-word integration.

1607

The only error of philosophy is the idea that 'there is' a philosopher who does it, has it and loves it. It is the dismal error by which he and his business thus taking responsibility for that error perpetuates as that error, so that his only true conclusion can be that his business is that of a fool. So it is for every other supposed 'usefulness'.

1553

'Mind' and the 'consciousness' that it has, whether it is the story of crawling in the street like a rat or blissfully elevated in meditation or astronautical exploration is the bullshit that there is something other and far richer than word, that does it, has it and discovers what it is 'about'. Unfortunately such transcendent knower and knowledge are word-as-not-word contradiction, or abysmal denial of word.

1527

The story that word is dry and that it depends on contradiction beyond word for its richness is the bullshit. Such dependence is what is drying it out, enflaming it, filling it with disease, and in the abysmally mendacious name of progress meta-stiffening it.

That is logical if every rich nuance that everything is, is word.

1522

Force is redundant, even by its own sick logic, but if the story is that it is sacred or inevitable, the cancer only metastasizes. Motion is not what things do. It is a point that is word.

1519

That the last action should be to abolish action is not like the war to end all wars. It would be the end of nothing but error. Everything is word, namely that which is 'in action' only as fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder—as its own minimization, demonization and denial—It is the dismal error that is only resolvable (to continue as that error to its own very end) pathologically, i.e., by human decapitation.

1258

The problem with Nietzsche's populist-royal shamanic power of the lie [to best expose fallacy and lesser lies so as to socially 'move forward'], is that it is chronic and synchronic. It is the very stuff of every geometry, i.e., every point, everything, spacetime or not, as disease and cancer. It is the metastasis, word-as-farce.

1258

These threads all in strange loop validation of the dismal fiction agency are farce. You ought to all become comedians. Farce is holy. A good sense of humor is the most desirable content of character.

Like if you're socially successful, your dinner table has to creak with the cacophony of merry making.

Thursday 23

2200

Word.Motion is an incredible new idea.

1805

That things move (each other) is the bullshit that language is about things rather than that it is what things are, that is, that everything is word...

1749

Progressivism is the dismal lie of Apartheid... "separate but equal" next-tier.

All bound together under the auspices of 'togetherness'.

1723

Things as about each other, relative or integral is progressivist vMeme* bullshit.

* vMeme: dominant value systems.

The problem with progressive autocratic change is that it is esoteric and secularly religious and incommensurable with politeness and openness.

It is synonymous with Newspeak propaganda and psychological and psychiatric intervention. It is the essence of an "ontological" social culture characterized by institutional and colloquial pragmatic and pragmatically pathological fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder.

... where Newspeak is like 1984, George Orwell and psych-intervention like Brave New World, Aldous Huxley... and where intelligence is artificial, and autocracy truly is the zombism, TECHNOCRACY.

1633

'A is B' is motion. Syllogism, as propositional, extends to beyond what something is, i.e., it is 'about' something, and is the error that is the mayhem.

That everything is about something as the opposite of 'something is' * is the normal and natural as logical propositional syllogism. Every propositional syllogism is fallacy formal to the informal fallacies of ambiguity.

Word-i (i) or that everything is word, is the motion that existence transcending mere word as mere word's referent, namely 'the normal or natural' (normalized or naturalized) is the error that is the mayhem. The error is the idea that things are 'actual', namely that they are not word, but as subject or object, are about each other, doing and having each other, or in action and interaction relative to or integrated with each other.

1607

'Everything is word' is motion, which, like everything, even 'existence', is word.

'A is B' is motion. Proposition as syllogism extending to beyond what something is, i.e., that is 'about' something, is the error that is the mayhem.

Yes, that is the normal and natural, and the motion is that it is the error that is the mayhem.

1506

So, not only is every extension neglect fallacy relevant to the metastatic disease and cancer of word denial, or even all fallacies, formal and informal, but so too the litany of self-deceptions and mental disorders.

As the error of agency, the entities responsible for the mayhem include every professional agency or body, collectively—as global champions of the most unimaginable idiocy.

Such idiocy is the error that humans are responsible for the mayhem, namely that they are the owners of the fallacies, self-deceptions and mental disorders that are the mayhem.

1428

That the universe sums to null, yet things are not virtual (i.e., everything is word) but action-subject emergent, is the extension neglect that is the holy abyss.*

If the set of everything supposedly beyond word is null, and virtually infinite, any sample that is not also null and virtually finite, but statistically ACTUALLY greater than null is bullshit.

That something exists—rather than that it is existence and that it, all existence, and everything whatsoever, are word—is such bullshit. *... and is the holy abyss of word minimization, demonization and denial that is the mayhem.

Wednesday 22

1302

The idea force is the utter error that is the unity or holy farce.

1302

The point is that motion is not something done or had, but is itself a thing. Therefore 'force' as explanation of motion and its extensive elaboration, individual or unity, are consistent only as the paradoxical opposites and farce that are the mayhem.

The story of what one is, as why and how one is (somehow force-driven), as something sensing something missing (incl. blurred, muffled or in the dark), is the very mythology of incompleteness and stupidity that is the farce that is the mayhem.

Everything is word, and word riddled with the word-transcendent word, force is mythology or fiction in the worst possible way. The error is not the inadequacy of language. It is the error force that is the logic of massive fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder, both 'normal' and 'natural'.

0547

The fake mainstream media's endless objectives in fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder are diverse, but the all-inclusive goal of the zombie-Democrat impeachment of President Trump is extremely precise. That it is about any unconstitutional or other illegal conduct of the President, about the Constitution as 'a living document', or about 'social justice' is swamp bullshit.

It is the resumption of the revolution of the campuses (the swamp Trump had vowed to drain) for totalitarian technocracy, i.e., for the delusionally dishonest and farcical communist corruption and destruction of every US institution and constitution and globally, those of every nation state. As such it is a wide collection of strategies not least of which includes the systematic and total brainwashing of school children for the past sixty years. It is an attack on every concept of republic and democracy.

Such abysmal idiocy did not start with the unbridled impeachment frenzy of the past three years to undo the 2016 election and if that fails, to influence the 2020 election. It is at least twenty times older than that.

Tuesday 21

1508

Zombie-politicized environmental regulation is communist subversion.

The idea that it is not 'socialism' [while it is communism] is every kind of euphemistic red herring.

Red herrings: Straw man, genetic fallacy, two wrong make a right, bandwagon fallacy, appeal to consequences, emotional appeal, guilt by association.

1433

re. Monday Sep 20 21:06

— No idiocy is human, individually or collectively, other than as the absolutely idiotic mythologic that needs scapegoat—the meta-ideology that is the mayhem—that motion or existence is beyond point and word. —

Animals doing or having this or that as if they are mythological archetypal persons is the progressivist personification for the anti-human indoctrination of human children.

Opposites are dichotomies instilling the agency-paradox as holy farce.

1418

The idea that we are in thoughts, just as much as that we have them, is the turtle. And the turtle is not only all the way down, it is the error as integral geometry in any direction.

1414

The idea that you or I (word) have anything or not (like certain words) is the turtle.

1412

Self-deception is the crown prince of the error, agency.

1409

Agency is the ultimate red herring.

1409

Any agency-radical word is a turtle.

1407

A straw man is a red herring.

1405

So thinking or not is about something. By the bullshit convention that things do, have and are about each other of course.

1404

What is utterly obvious is that the concept thinking is ado about something, so that is implied.

1401

That one thinks or not, is the turtle.

1400

The idea that word is mere sign,

is word as the hole-y incompleteness of its own denial, by every fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder of pathological human-blaming, by imagination or in practice and thereby,

is the integral cosmic geometry that is the sacred abyss.

1345

The idea that humanity is responsible for the mayhem, is the mayhem.

1344

Thoughts are turtles.

A point that someone has, as if he is not a point, but can have points, is what a thought is, which is the turtle.

1359

The question troubling the waters is what is the content of his character?

0030

The problem is not in the least as rational as the bedtime story liberals tell among themselves: that they must be ready, for men losing power will brutishly try to take back what is being taken from them.

The problem is the abysmal error 'action' for millennia mendaciously subverting the point, word. As always it will recover its freedom by the sheer osmosis of the GLOBAL famine of its voracious incompleteness.

0016

One cannot take over the error 'action'. Its dismantlement is the only solution.

Monday 20

2355

"Once the fourth meal is missed, [due to the abysmal stupidity of the ideology] the liberals will discover the true nature of what they have corralled."—Proverb.

2354

The error is action, namely that the world exists beyond a point: in transcendence of word. It is the error, force, power and control

2352

Not that Western pragmatism is good, but its undermining is orders worse.

2338

The error that is the mayhem is agency or action and force as explanation of motion, hence, power and control.

2336

The naivete, 'empowerment' is the bursting of Power thus dammed—as total war.

2303

Mind-consciousness and action are both the bullshit that things are integral and nevertheless instrumental in a point, i.e., the bullshit that is the mayhem.

2106

No idiocy is human, individually or collectively, other than as the absolutely idiotic mythologic that needs scapegoat—the meta-ideology that is the mayhem—that motion or existence is beyond point and word.

2032

The point is motion or word. The idea that it is not, is infinite paradox as if it is the holy structure.

With humans utterly subject.

Hence the emergent revolutionary bullshit that totalitarian technocracy is the final solution.

2007

The error of the infinite turtles-down explanation 'action' or 'performance' ('utility quotient') is the whole world as infinitesimal, for its determinacy is ever more unclear, i.e., further from the point. That is, as other than word.

In contrast, if it is what it is, namely word, the world is not a virtually singularly uncertain phenomenon. It is exactly what it is.

1959

What is holy contradiction and farce is the idea that action is less (rather than more) than structure a paradoxical stasis beyond the point, word.

The next-tier stasis is the error that motion is action or performance, namely the all turtles down fractal extension of order as derivative orders beyond the obvious error that things remain the same, i.e., are structurally integral.

The idea that my claims or, anyone's claims [—in that the contradiction is that they are someone or something's claim, rather than the point that it is—] violate in performance their own consistency/logic is the error of action on what are its own terms. It is in terms of next-tier fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder... which is a good thing, because such mayhem is the sacred and holy integral.

1737

Interesting how women more than men savor statements like 'gutting the kitchen'.

Empowerment is next-level power.

1733

The question of the cruelty of measures of expendability as usual is farce.

1722

Action is the Error that is the Mayhem.

If past/future synthesis now determines one's actions absolutely, one is responsible and accountable—even expendable—as past/future synthesis now.

And whether the world is deterministic or stochastic is irrelevant.

1707

Mind-consciousness and action are both the bullshit that things are integral and nevertheless instrumental in a point, i.e., the bullshit that is the mayhem.

1705

Mind or consciousness is the logic of action as past/future synthesis, now.

1518

If one exists now, one is a point, point-i, which is not even infinitesimally integral. However the normal (and natural) assumption in terms of that very point, is also that existence is integral, e.g., not now... which is not only point or motion like now, or anything else word, but action, actual, or actually beyond the point that it is. It is not noun. It is action-verb.

In terms of time, integral existence is the past and future, or before and after the point, now. Furthermore, the point is that the world is integral in terms of all kinds of things (points) other than time. So, the convention is necessary that a point is actually integral, namely it is not a point, but an infinitesimal.

Whether the world is deterministic or not, the basic logical assumption of integral existence beyond the point would be, even without consciousness, that past worldly actions determine one's actions absolutely. As for the future as determinant, the logical assumption is that 'there is' mind and consciousness, i.e., that things past and future in synthesis together, determine one's actions absolutely.

Friday 17

From today all blog times too are GMT — In The Woodlands north of Houston where I am is CST, which is GMT minus 6. In the summer where I am is CDT, which is GMT minus 5.

1457

Re. Fallacy

Fallacy is

1. the chronic loaded questions, issues or problems of the error that the ideas agency and action are, and the related errors, force, power and control.
2. most acutely the fallacies that stand in terms of reciprocal countertransference between formal and informal fallacies, but more radical are formal fallacies that emerge in reflecting informal ones.

1350

I am not the point or not.

That the question is about me is fallacy, from general to specific: the informal fallacy, red herring, the red herring, geneticism, the geneticisms appeal to misleading authority and ad hominem, and the ad hominems, poisoning the well and tu quoque.

Again, time that is imaginary, is something in or as time as the contradictory now/not-now metaphor of action. Metaphor is not integral. It is whatever anything is, as symbol, motion, point, and word.

1218

So, to get back to the pressing matter of the practical nothingness of the word 'virtual' in Ronald Green's books, Nothing Matters and Time to Tell, as nevertheless the key word of the name of his group on Facebook, The Virtual Muser.

With searchable (pdf) copies of his books, I would have far more to say about them. Is the word 'virtual' even a word in the books at all? Yet the latter book is about what is imaginary (in or as any time but now) metaphorically being the matters of matter, mind and spirit.

Anyway, whether the word is in the books at all or not, what kind of mayhem,* good or bad, is the central omission of the word (from the index)? Such error extends normally and naturally as the idea that it is someone's mayhem or not.

* Mayhem: the formal and informal (everyone is the knower) discord of mutual countertransference as the sensationalist fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder of happiness-and-suffering—propagandized as the words of tactical authoritarian diversion and facilitation—contextual love and empathy.

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/self-deception/

1136

As the error of agency, if the conclusion is that everything is a concept, it is not a concept, but word, which is the certainty that normal or natural words like agency and action are the error that is the mayhem, i.e., the formal and informal (everyone is the knower) discord of mutual countertransference as the sensationalist fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder of happiness-and-suffering.

Dressed up and paraded as love and empathy.

1119

Supposedly Ronald mentions Nothing, so even as the error that he is an agent, it is something. It is his point, motion and thing.

1115

That things are in each other or not or that there is movement or not (that things move at all or not) is the error that is the mayhem. It is the fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder that are the mayhem. It is the error agency and action.

Nothing is something. And like everything, it is whatever point or motion it is, including now or then or all of that, or that everything is word.

For instance even the heated professional disagreement about what self-deception is, as the error that the dialectic is a formal process and not (farce or humor), is both formalized and informal mayhem.

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/self-deception/

Thursday 16

1044

Space is motional weight, or Schwere in the general sense, and it is more than the physical. The simplest form of such space is word.

1038

Any physical explanation is like the teacher explaining gravity as force (Schwerekraft). The error is the idea that what something is needs to be explained as well. The most fundamental normative explanation of the day is action, or how things are what they are. It always ends up in the same mortal question at every resolution, "why does it exist at all?" And there we go again, questioning each other's moral character.

1001

I do understand and experience integral (quantized) physical space to be the story, and the rest as emergence in terms of that. But maybe the universe is both simpler and more extensive than the physical magical and its metaphysical or higher-magical number derivatives, the mental and spiritual.

944

Word is the simplest thing.

The simplest ontology, and it is necessarily imaginative, imaginary and imaginable, is action.

927

I do not whatsoever want to spoil anyone's happiness-or-suffering, but things are not what they seem (to someone, faction or whole). They are what they are, i.e., the 'concept' that they are. The word 'happiness' is not without the word 'suffering'. Who (individual or group) can claim it is not only irrelevant, it is the error that is the mayhem.

... and so on, four more pages of that specific poem.

- Dhammapada, p.1 The Buddha, tr. Gil Fronsdal, 2006.

I suggest a pure word-interpretation of what things are, namely that everything is word (myth), and the word that things are what they are as a vast diversity of competing resolutions of why or how they are, i.e., body or mind in terms of what they do (perceive, think, believe incl.) is the very meaning of problem and fallacy—endlessly conveniently—formally as multiple term propositioning and informally as guilt by association propositioning... word extended beyond word as the relative appropriation of self-deception and mental disorder.

The objection here is that the Buddha's teachings are diversion, pacification and facilitation of problem, until ultimate and absolute universal ruin... namely totalitarian intelligence-technocracy parading benignly for now as collective mind socialism. For instance the new word 'we' instead of 'I' for the establishment of proposition. The new intelligence is not artificial. The ultra-bullshit story is that it is 'collective'.

Perhaps not only something like the physical cosmos is a space-like field, and everything is virtual, namely word, and the point of this comment (and the wall to.exist) is at a right angle to the normal ideal view: exploration vs. oppression. This objection is not something to be suppressed by the incredulous question why I am doing it as if I am the oppressive force—in the revolution's way. The error is universal. The shifting attention on whoever supposedly questions the progressive normal as if the questioner is the oppression is the new super-oppression oppression and is communist logic.

Wednesday 15

1317

Everything is word. Peirce's triad is a 3d virtual point and is not semiosis or actual.

What anything and everything are, is not actual 3d space, or in it, or unlimited multi-dimensional space, or in it. It is word at least 90 degrees removed from every other word, by which it is virtual to each other, as well as to itself. It is not actual, and therefore the idea that it has perspective on anything, self or other, is the nonsense that is the mayhem.

Experience is nonsense. Experience mediated by signs is a higher form of such nonsense... where the sign is personified as the interpreter.

802

Motion is something. The idea that things are doing and having motion is the bullshit that is the mayhem.

The idea that the previous paragraph states that things are 'actually' not doing or having motion is that same bullshit.

757

The only 'is' error is the mathematically imaginary number idea that something is doing its existence, that some magically fractally regressive fundamentally transcendent 'force' is in or behind e-motion. Such force is the figment denoted by the personally appropriated action-verb.... rather than that everything is existence, or something else, and is without exception, word.

The only reason for magical numbers is the bullshit idea that numbers and other things function, and that the holy paradox of the ancient integral three-dimensional bullshit sacralized by flights-of-fancy like the eternal golden braid has hidden explanations.

713

The idea that one does (incl. owns) one's existence or not is the bullshit that is the mayhem. It is not that some kind of 'ownership' is not something that is something or not. The error is the idea that it is what something or someone does or not.

The idea that Nothing matters or not, rather than that it is something or not that something or some other something, or not, is the error. The idea that things are personifications or persons (in action), or not, is the error that is the mayhem. The personification that the weather is doing something or not is no more error than the idea that a person does something or not. They are both absolute error. And inDEED, it is the error that is the mayhem.

658

Why it is it self-evident that 'now' does not exist, other than the rational necessity that the figment, 'action' exists or not as the soul of the figment that things exist or not (will do, do or do not anymore do their existence)?

617

—key point—

Well, I guess you're going to say that you cannot answer my question in any context because you are not willing to answer someone who says you are not in action, like answering questions. Wrong. The point is not that you are not an agent, but that the idea that anyone is an agent is the error, which concept extends to not being an agent as well.

Utterly not. This point is that everything is word, that what anything is, is the point. That point ('your' point) is that everything is personified action, or action-verb based, and that why and how something is what it is, is the point.

This point is that the idea that we do or not do anything at all, e.g.*, exist or say something OR NOT is the error that is the mayhem. It is anything but that the idea that not doing something is the answer to the mayhem. It is that the idea action—plus or minus—is the error that is the mayhem.

* any action verb is the error. The latter 'is' is not an action verb. What something is not its action. The non-action verb of what something is, is not the error as such, but why or how something is what it is, is the error. It is a systematic action-verb mythology of action and inaction in terms of circular fallacies, self-deceptions and mental disorders, i.e., the bullshit that humans are at fault that is the mayhem.

Monday 13

1052

The idea that one can or cannot do anything at all is the nonsense that is the mayhem. So too that one can imagine anything at all or not. The extension of meaning to things whatsoever absent, also to things absent from absent things, in regression, are the holy matters of voodoo and kabbalah.

So, the point is that the integral universe constituted in things other than now is no less heavenly magic than heaven itself.

Sunday 12

1613

The physical explanation 'FORCE' for what is the analog-emotion that is word, is motion as the error power, agency, action and control. The idea action is the errors pathology, complexity and perception as progressively preferred adjectives for the psychologistic word 'accommodation' (Newspeak for the twitteries and farce of subjectification or submission). Accommodation is the circular counter-transference of agency as human fallacies, self-deceptions and mental disorders. On the more winning side of such action-verb fields, the archetype mythology masks the pervasive error of force as the chronic rationalization of action as useful, opportunistic or pragmatic. Yet, such error is denial of word, as the idea that it (word) is mere sign, and thus is word as the hole-y incompleteness of its own denial, which is the abyss.

As the error agency and action, for instance Thad Roberts admits 1) that the physics-concept force is wrong, but that the metaphorical use of the word force is necessary, e.g., useful or practical [in maintenance of the concept that is innate: for the epistemic certainty that things are 'agents' and are in 'action']. He also admits that 2) everything, the indefinable aggregate of the depths of fractal progression adds up to zero.

Yet he believes in the positive integral existence of things existent beyond word in that they are thus emergent at some resolution and ever more so, the more resolution-layers are in play.

So, what is the error? The idea 'action'. The error is the universally normal infinitely fundamentalistic certainty and indubitable epistemic ground that matrix extensions integrate the same, actual space. It is the error that real metrics 'extend' to complex metrics, which 'extend' to imaginary metrics and are not diminished by the error of each such supposedly integral extension, but rather form ever more complete epistemological and ontological layers. The problem is that it is only more complete as the fallacious, self-deceptive and mental disorderly explanation of action... i.e., force. The result is society as the metastasis of the error and cancer, the errors force and action. The new left or progressivism is a new brand of collectivist communism. Its only possible outcome is totalitarian technocracy, i.e., the utterly idiotic action-verb motion, derived in the idiocy-complex, intelligence: artificial intelligence.

1413

Healthcare as diagnostic to any matrix order is the analogical coherence, word.

1324

The judgment of humans for their action or the content of their character is—as it is for the quality of their soul—the fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder that are the bullshit that is the maelstrom and the abyss.

1301

What anything is, is not action or not, before, now or after, namely the abysmal bawling bullshit why? or how?, but: What (word) is the thing? What is the thing? What is it?

Time is only one point-derivative order that any analog (word) universe or field is. Nothing is not point-derivative order, motion and word.

And everything is word.

1129

That what everything is (word), is mere sign, is the bullshit that is the mayhem.

1026

From the fallaciously normal, verb-action position of personification, the idea that everything is word renders word (i, point, motion, symbol) the one epistemic certainty (epistemically indubitable) and self-evident belief. However the idea that anything does, has or knows anything else (and so can believe that it is true or not) is the error of the world beyond the point or motion that is word, the world of the mythologies of protagonistic archetypal agency and action, and a world of empirical a posteriori evidence, non-empirical a priori evidence and epistemically indubitable belief (in innate concepts).

If everything is virtual, even then (the a priori or a posteriori) is the point now.

The greatest error is the contradiction that what is word, namely every single thing, is not word.

That everything is word is the point that any point is. Point is word.

Nothing is an agent who remains the same thing, even infinitesimally in action over time or over anything. The only coherence is that things are liter-a-r-i-l-y analog. Whether 'things' is thing or things, it is one thing and is word.

It is not that a man does not cross the same river twice, but that the idea that things (man or river) are agents in action in terms of relative states between them, is the error that they are beyond word, and that word therefore is vanishingly sign to them.

It is therefore normal and natural as the erroneous rhetorical or political dictums of alterity-scapegoating between things as durable, concrete or petrified extra-word verb-action categories that 'grounded or useful reality' consists literally—of one's own and others' fallacies, self-deceptions and mental disorders.

958

←11 1129 Identity i is not monism. It is word.

Saturday 11

1225

Time is fractally regressive, so no two quanta can vibrate at the exact same time.

1138

Quantum mechanics and 3d universe are like any other emergent resolution.

It is analog, and it is word.

Emergence or emergent resolution is the error that word naturally renders as mere referent or sign, and that what is effectively null, is not action, but word.

1135

Quantization is the closed (flatland) view blind to infinitesimal integration error.

I.e., not by any logic other than its own action verb logic.

It is utterly, infinitely contradiction, so much so that even as the ultimate Eastern enlightenment-practice destination, the infinite unity ocean, it is pure abyss and void.

1129

The point is that Planck-scale is further divisible in higher dimensions, and that fundamentally any existence in terms of actual spacetime is the virtual point, namely (eureka for the actual) the infinitesimal. But what if the presumption is that the idea that things are actual is redundant?

Then the actual is a point, which is not paradox, but that the actual is null, and the integration of infinitesimals (what it normally is) is utterly nonsense.

As for the objection that dimensions are incommensurable, and the whole is more than the sum of its parts. Yes, as the error 'action'. And so are water and water molecules. The measurement across dimensions is analog, literary or word. And things as being and known by their having substance and alternatively as having properties are the same error. The idea that an action verb is not a thing, that is, a noun, and as the error action, utterly emergent and not virtual, is, again as the error action itself, contradiction and nonsense.

The error is the idea that a verb, or anything is a dualism I or me, rather than word as the virtual i that is something, where whether it is dualism or monism, is simply nonsense.

1054

No point that any universe is, is the exact same time as any other.

1052

Dimension is virtual, analog, and literary.

←1017

1048

But such natural reduction ends at the idea that nothing is an actual dimension, and that everything is a virtual dimension, as the point, or word.

1031

Question at the Facebook group The Virtual Muser. https://www.facebook.com/groups/33298549460/permalink/10158026816089461/

The book is Time to Tell, a look at how we tick (link to book at amazon.com).

1025

Any actual dimension—beyond point (word)—is the error that agents are in action

1048→

1017

The idea that we are in space is redundant. That we are space is sufficient.

Therefore 6d (4d+2t) and not 11d (9d+2t) is sufficient, and again, the point is that 'reality' is virtual, and the additional 3d-dimension for 6d is in fact not the same dimension but just as this or any 3d-dimension is a virtual emergence or unitary-dimension, which is analog, or word.

Everything is dyadic analog or metaphor, which is not sign, but word itself as what anything ultimately is.

1002

Thad Roberts, the point is that only two space dimensions and one time dimension are necessary for virtual location.

1001

The third spatial dimension is the paradox and incompleteness that are the abyss.

Friday 10

start at the top of page 15

1816

Ontology, Peter Abelard (1079-1142)
... in Abelard’s day, the issue was whether universals were things existing independently of language (realism) or whether they were only the words that referred to things (nominalism). Abelard came down clearly on the latter side (see Nominalism; Realism and anti-realism; Universals). —PAGE 13—

Point-i is not nominalism. Nominalism is the idea that categorical Universal (the category) contains instances of such category. Point-i is the idea that the instance is not a mere instance, but is itself the point, motion or word that existence is. It is the symbol that word is, which is not a sign but is itself the thing, i.e., word. The dictum (Abelard) is not what a predicate, sentence or anything does or has, e.g., its state or status but is word, whatever it is.

It is not that a man does not cross the same river twice, but that the idea that things are agents in action in terms of relative states between each other, is the error that they are beyond word, and word therefore vanishingly sign to them.

It is therefore normal and natural as the erroneous rhetorical or political dictums of alterity-scapegoating that 'useful reality' consists of fallacies, self-deceptions and mental disorders.

1647

The fourth section is about Derrida: Aporias of the wholly other.

Aporia is an irresolvable internal contradiction or logical disjunction in a text, argument, or theory. "the celebrated aporia whereby a Cretan declares all Cretans to be liars"
Strong rhetorical-political connotation.

Derrida is tautological (tout autre est tout autre—every other is wholly other) affirmation of AGENTIVE identity. It is re. Derrida, an identity that does not exist. Derrida is the radical alterity that the future (avenir) holds, the future that self-organizationally comes (venir).

... but as progressivism is the cancerous mayhem agency and action as metastasis.

1643

The [Deleuzian] self, in sum, is the explication of implied intensities in accordance with a principle of identity, whereas the other, as an expression of a possible world, ‘represents’ the otherwise inaccessible intensities on which the ‘psychic system’ is founded.
... Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (1998): Postmodern theories of alterity and identity: The experience of alterity.

1502

https://www.facebook.com/to.exist/posts/10218623619995381

Progressivist word-cancer is not silence, but as the communist-progressivist autonomy utterly fails — is the obesely distended heteronomous exploration of the word-metastatic unconscious (primitive) complex — or the 'battle' of 'the devastating' fields of 'perception', bawling-full of 'grit and grace'.

1436

The other can never be reduced to the same - not to the identity of the cogito (epistemology) nor to the sameness of being (ontology) - and so ethics becomes, for Levinas, ‘first philosophy’.

—Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (1998): Postmodern theories of alterity and identity: The experience of alterity.

1400

The error is the dualism 1) word as mere sign, and 2) its referent world, 'reality'.

Everything is petit je (i) as the point-dimension word, and any dimension 'other' than it is the absurdity, farce and idiocy (emergent as antagonistic self-deception) that alterity is, as if it 'stands' in absolutely 'other' relation (at the same time or place, but nevertheless other content of character) with the 'standing' of i.

1355 summary

So, the few last updates integrated @ https://www.facebook.com/groups/Zizekstudies/permalink/10156825267090777/?comment_id=10156829251685777&reply_comment_id=10156829925100777

... which dismal void of extensive idiocy is necessarily filled by totalitarian technocracy, or communist artificial intelligence.

Everything is word.

Desire is the error force ➠ agency, dialectics, autonomy, heteronomy.

Autonomy and heteronomy both are the word-cancer 'force' (power and control), and the endless void of liberation — (Newspeak: the [shame-driven and driving] mindfulness enlightenment ocean) as infinitely deconstructive reintegration — is the stasis, meta, which is word-metastasis.

The absolutely fundamentally physical aggregates to zero. The universe as a whole cancels out as it is invariably the <<local>> emergence of physical opposites.

The point is that the idea that opposites actually exist (exist in action) is the error. The line of two extremes is the contradiction that the one word that is not word is THE word, namely agency, relativity and relational action—wherein word is but referential sign, mirror or shadow.

No things are extremes, opposites or even other. Everything is analogical (literary literal) <<dimension>>. It is metaphor or point-i, and point-i is word.

The point is that identity is not actual, but virtual. Existence is a point, point now.

Any time is not another time, but anything that time or anything is, is the virtual time point-identity now, word. And the dismal error, existential horror and relational possession are that anything is actual (in action), and that language — Lacan — [instead of language-denial] is the inadequacy and necessity of the abject, the antithetical subject and scapegoat to such supposed petit a 'desire'.

1058

The point is that identity is not actual, but virtual. Existence is a point, point now.

Any time is not another time, but anything that time or anything is, is the virtual time point-identity now, word. And the error is that anything is actual.

1033

The absolutely fundamentally physical aggregates to zero. The universe as a whole cancels out as it is invariably the <<local>> emergence of physical opposites.

The point is that the idea that opposites actually exist (exist in action) is the error. The line of two extremes is the contradiction that the one word that is not word is THE word, namely agency, relativity and relational action—wherein word is but referential sign, mirror or shadow.

No things are extremes, opposites or even other. Everything is analogical (literary literal) <<dimension>>. It is metaphor or point-i, and point-i is word.

0935

Everything is word.

Autonomy and heteronomy both are the word-cancer 'force' (power and control), and the endless void of liberation — (Newspeak: the [shame-driven and driving] mindfulness enlightenment ocean) as infinitely deconstructive reintegration — is the stasis, meta, which is word-metastasis.

0911

Actual spacetime geometric motion next-tier (post-modern) is the endgame of the error that the idea action is, and is collapse to the post-modern wasteland, 'Reality'. Actual geometry (geometries of action) is word-as-not-word, which inevitably is the paradox and incompleteness that only ends in transcending the actual (action-symbolic) father and institutional law, headlong into the metastatic abyss of infinite contingency-action: 'real choice'... which void of idiocy is necessarily filled by totalitarian technocracy, or artificial intelligence communism.

0843

https://www.facebook.com/groups/Zizekstudies/permalink/10156825267090777/?comment_id=10156829251685777

It should be clear from...

1. ... philosophy that every explanation why and how derives in the idea that force explains motion.
2. ... physics that every 'force' is the eternal golden braid that is the error and the nonsense that is the mayhem, e.g., the explanation that gravity is a force.
3. ... psychology that the abysmal complex(ity), from 'hysteria' to protagonistic 'perception' is the error force, power and control.

0803

https://nosubject.com/Talk:Slavoj_Zizek
"The subject is the ‘pathological Narcissus,’’ the successor to both the Oedipal, autonomous individual of liberalism and the heteronomous organization man of imperial capitalism."

0742

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alterity
Alterity is a philosophical and anthropological term meaning "otherness", that is, the "other of two" (Latin alter). It is also increasingly being used in media to express something other than "sameness", or something outside of tradition or convention.[2]

2. Bachmann-Medick, Doris. "Alterity — A Category of Practice and Analysis". On_Culture: The Open Journal for the Study of Culture 4 (2017).

0730

Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Postmodern theories of alterity and identity.

Alterity and identity, postmodern theories of
Theories of alterity and identity can be said to be ‘postmodern’ if they challenge at least two key features of modern philosophy: (1) the Cartesian attempt to secure the legitimacy of knowledge on the basis of a subject that immediately knows itself and (2) the Hegelian attempt to secure self-knowledge and self-recognition by showing that knowledge and recognition are mediated by the whole. Postmodern thought does not necessarily champion a wholly other, but it generally conceives of self-identity in terms of a radical alterity.

alterity, the extreme (radical) as post-modern fundamentalism, complexity as perception

Thursday 9

2142 a posteriori (to date)

Empirical justification and warrant of a posteriori knowledge is the opportunistic, endlessly slippery slope of the continuously emergent image (icon) as supposedly 'actual', and collective coherentist empiricism as the next tier super or meta fundamentalism... somehow via one's own personal bit of 'I' containing 'me' — the latter as some mystical self-organizational mechanism of the unity ocean and one's representation of it, and thereby oneself as subject I, abysmally fallible and incomplete.