Blog24.06
|
Dismantle Psychology Free Mankind of the Horror of Suffering the Error Words have by mythological habit (mask and cloak) been relegated to the status of tools for communication, through the word “perception,” perceived as mere vehicles to convey thoughts, feelings, and experiences. However, if in the word-constitutional idea of movement and action we delve deeper into the theory that words are not just representations of reality but are indeed reality itself, we at long last open up man’s cognition, experience, and perception as not incomplete, but uniquely word. — movement and action are the point that a word is text in the unitary scope of its definition (context) to any order of dynamism real. The normalized error is that it is denied as point, and isolated as “abstract” ‘infinitesimal derivative’ “about” the qualities of its “‘tangibly integral’ [non-word] referent in and as ‘the world’” — Man’s cognition, experience, and perception after millennia of being thereby mutually held responsible for the error and constituted in the darkest most bigoted sadism would literally be disinterred from the brutally violent abuse of the erroneous myth and mythology. Lately the habitualized brutality has been peaking as Psychology, wherein fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder are as never before fiendishly psychotic smears set up mutually projected as “human nature,” native to “human subjectivity.” The condescending word, “human” is the pivot point of “the mind” and thus is the cybernetic nexus of mutual societal “mental” abuse, i.e., “together moving forward” is mankind obliviously set up as cybernetic automatons, as the psychological junkies of fallacy, the psychic zombies of self-deception, and the psychiatric farcies of mental disorder. The word, “human” is the fulcrum of the subversion and destruction of mankind. AI is Psychologism. It is the Cybernetic Logic of the Error That Psychology Is. For instance, a competing diversity of groups are emerging in the timelessly confirmational principle of so-called critical race theory that to punish members of other groups for historically acting wrong would solve the world's problems. It smacks of the mid-level sadism driving every genocide. Artificial intelligence is increasingly the cutting edge cybernetics baseline. It is the Hyper Bullshit, Psychology as the sort of conceited intelligence now after more than a century of its focused development most practicable (as metastatic weapon) to learn and to use. Nothing is more Satanic than AI, i.e., The formlessness of whatever the Master Psyche is. Master to all so-called psyches. The lies the medical community are couched in are anti-language, i.e., anti-word. The proliferation of science in the cybernetic enumeration process of "the facts of the matter" of moving forward is AI, i.e., anti-word. The medical community's chronically incremental mendacity is metastatic psychologism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEwIAVSI7WI The psyche is a mask and psychology a cloak covering up the truth These Critiques and Challenges against Point-i are rife with fallacy, self-deception, and even mental disorder. <<While Point-i offers a revolutionary perspective on the nature of reality, it also faces critiques and challenges. One significant critique is the potential accusation of solipsism—that it suggests a closed-loop system where nothing exists beyond language. Critics argue that physical reality provides a counterpoint to the notion that everything is a linguistic construct.>> “Solipsism” is ad hominem in this context resting on a half-baked strawman in AI-Psychologism. Psychology is artificial intelligence. It is from the beginning AI, as the erroneous notion “the psyche” in constitution of the cacophony of errors of mankind as “subjectively human.” It is lately that it is cybernetically taken next-tier. The usefulness of the ad hominem diversion of the accusation targeting “the psyche” is to use the ensuing desired imbalance of the man to shadily reassert “physical reality” as not in any capacity of conceptualization utterly words. <<Another challenge is the dynamic and evolving nature of language itself. If words and meanings change over time, does reality change with them? This raises questions about the stability and constancy of reality if it is entirely dependent on language.>> Dynamics (movement) and evolution (change) are derivative-embodied point-integrals and not “infinitesimal” derivatives as if they are abstractions to be tangibly (to “the senses”) integrated after the fact. So, as integrals, derivatives in and of themselves are things that utterly fit the definition that they like all things are word. <<Moreover, different languages offer different conceptual frameworks. Does this mean that speakers of different languages live in entirely different realities? This is a point that brings into focus the relativistic nature of the theory, which can be both its strength and its Achilles’ heel.>> Again black-and-white fallacy strawman. Point-i is nowhere whatsoever the notion that word-derivative points are clinically separable from their integrals. They are the integral point, word. In fact no word is ever the same exact word. It is always some different definition. Insofar as the definition is similar, similarity is another word, i.e., point-derivative integral. So too the instance. It too is point-derivative integral, and always different. As for translations between languages of similarity in that sense: More point-derivative integral manifold. Linguistic Relativity and Point-i <<However, Point-i takes this a step further [than linguistic relativity] by positing that not only does language shape our perception, but it also solely constitutes our reality.>> More than that. Point-i is the point that we (all that we are) are word-definition. It is also the point that word in any way acting or moving or changing, is itself word-definition. And how and why those points are what they are, are again word-definition. Thus everything is word. It is not that reality itself is a linguistic construct of cognitive processes, for that would imply construction in the world beyond word, unless the point is clear as the integral definition that the point is, that all of that is word-definition, i.e., word. The psyche is a mask and psychology a cloak covering up the truth that mankind as bare face and body in all complexity is word-definition. Point-i is not the point that mankind is subjective, error prone and otherwise fallible. It is the point that the idea that mankind is thus subjective is the error that is the dissemination of fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder as the way that one is naturally set up and trained from birth, i.e., normalized, as not mankind, but "human." And once human, thereby fit virtually only for genocide and extinction. |