|
Blog24.06
|
The mathematical integration of points rather than infinitesimals is valid and sound for the first time in history The idea that we can make sense of the manifold aspects of existence in an integrated manner is absolute realization if the unifying principle is word, or that everything is word. The mathematical integration of points rather than infinitesimals is sincerely possible [for the first time in history] due to the understanding that everything is absolutely derived, differentiated, integrated and defined in terms of word-definition to the absolute extent that they are all word and not reference or referent to anything but word. This notion not only restructures the basic tenets of mathematics but also encompasses the essence of meaning, form, and texture in what is not merely an entirely new paradigm... since the paradigm in the conventional sense is about so-called subjectivity about WORLDS beyond word-definition. That everything is word is what Bertrand Russell tried to say when he said that pure logic is a logic of variables, rather than of names. The point is that word is the unity variable,* to any order. Everything is word. Word is the symbol that everything is. Such symbol is no reference or referent. It is what everything is. Therefore that everything is word is the purest possible logic. * Unity Variable 1) Unity: Unity here implies a wholeness or completeness, a state that integrates all aspects into a coherent whole. 2) Variable: In both mathematics and linguistics, a variable is a symbol or element that can assume any value within a given set or range. When combined, "unity variable" suggests an element that can take on any form or value, while still maintaining an inherent oneness or wholeness. Word thus encapsulates all possible forms of existence. It is what existence is. It is also what every other word is. Existence is but one of them. Word is the symbol that everything is. Such symbol is no reference or referent. The point is not that word transcends anything. It is that the idea that the world transcends word is the error in terms of words that is the confusion and the violence, including the idea that language has limitations in a "semiotic" relationship. But more brutal than anything else, is the rhetoric of the abyss that humans, with human subjectivity and error, are responsible for it. Word is not an indicator of another entity, but instead is that entity. This approach eliminates dualities and dichotomies —like signifier and signified, subject and object—merging them into a single, unified "word". Pure Logic... By stating that “everything is word,” point-i posits that the integration of points as word integration is “pure logic.” Pure Logic: Traditional logic is based on principles like identity, non-contradiction, and excluded middle. However, “pure logic” suggests the purest form of logic—one that doesn't rely on binary oppositions or distinctions but sees unity in diversity. This means that regardless of the complexity, variability, or multiplicity of existence, the understanding or grasping of everything as "word" represents absolute clarity and cohesion. ..... The Photon's Perspective is Commensurate with Point-i The physical photon for its masslessness does not have perspective in the word/experience dualism in which words stand for ontology and epistemology, semiotics and hermeneutics, and myth and mythology specifically normal and natural not as a word virtual reality but as something (physical, abstract, or spiritual) beyond word. However, if everything is word the massless photon's perspective is absolutely feasible, virtually. That any point is timelessly everywhere at once is exactly the point that everything is word. It follows that reality is the integration of points instead of derivatives, and each integration is another point. Such integration is not essentially physical in any dualistic sense. It is physical in or as virtual worlds in terms of words, i.e., in terms of stories. Whether world, myth, or word-definition, it is word. Point-i states that ontology and epistemology, semiotics and hermeneutics, and myth and mythology as reality are a word virtual reality, again in the sense that if the story is that it is run by something or someone in terms of their words, such entities and their words are also word. What about Bertrand Russell's wish for constants in pure logic? By the way Russell's musing about the introduction of constants into pure logic is moot in point-i, since constants in each virtual application are themselves word, i.e., variable to any order of point-derivation, no matter how constant (immutably natural law) they are. I think the Jesuits tried something similar as point-i in the matter of The Law, but Voltaire's works in terms of word-transcending buffoonery shot the effort to bits, hence the monstrosity that followed, i.e., The French Revolution—la liberté (female) of guilt before proving innocence. So, how much of that crap [chaotic absurdity] has washed into the current notion of Natural Law? Swaths of it. That one gots to laugh at oneself is facilitation of the abysmal bullshit that what one is doing is not the institution and constitution of fallacy, self-deception, and confusion, and the self-annihilation of mankind by mutually blaming the error on each other, where supposedly we actually practically live, beyond any mere human concept, where our feet ought to be on the ground, i.e., beyond word. Dissonant bullshit only possible with vast measures of farcical violence. If not now, later. Utterly Brainwashed AI Concubinary Zombies Never was there a greater tyranny* of the majority than the one the Democrats and the RINO Republicans are instigating by their chronic psychologistic AI empowerment-subversion of The Republic. * Tyranny of the majority: It is to guard against such tyranny that the word "democracy" is not in The Declaration of Independence or in The Constitution. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||