|
|
| PART 2: COMMON SOURCES OF PROBLEMS
|
|
|
| 10. Ethics, Science, and Pseudoscience
| 115
|
| 11.Ethical Fallacies
| 121
|
| 1. Ad hoc rationalization
| 121
|
| 2. Ad hominem or ad feminam (bullshit. ad hominem.)
| 122
|
| 3. Affirming the consequent
| 122
|
| 4. Appeal to ignorance (ad ignorantium)
| 123
|
| 5. Argument to logic (argumentum ad logicam
| 123
|
| 6. Begging the question (petitio principii)
| 123
|
| 7. Composition fallacy
| 124
|
| 8. Denying the antecedent
| 124
|
| 9. Disjunctive fallacy
| 125
|
| 10. Division fallacy or decomposition fallacy
| 125
|
| 11. Existential fallacy
| 125
|
| 12. False analogy
| 126
|
| 13. False continuum
| 126
|
| 14. False dilemma
| 126
|
| 15. False equivalence
| 127
|
| 16. Genetic fallacy
| 127
|
| 17. Golden mean fallacy
| 127
|
| 18. Ignoratio elenchi
| 128
|
| 19. Mistaking deductive validity for truth
| 128
|
| 20. Naturalistic fallacy
| 128
|
| 21. Nominal fallacy
| 129
|
| 22. Post hoc, ergo propter hoc (after this, therefore on account of this)
| 129
|
| 23. Red herring
| 130
|
| 24. Slippery slope (the camel's nose fallacy)
| 130
|
| 25. Straw person —bullshit. Straw man
| 131
|
| 26. You too! (tu quoque)
| 131
|
| 12. Pitfalls in Ethical Judgment
| 132
|
| 1. Substitute the general for the specific
| 144
|
| 2. Use a conditional frame for consequences
| 145
|
| 3. Use denied motivation as misdirection
| 145
|
| 4. Use the abstract language of technicalities
| 145
|
| 5. Use the passive voice
| 145
|
| 6. Make unimportant by describing what did not occur
| 146
|
| 7. Replace intentional unethical behavior with the language of
accidents, misfortune, and mistakes
| 147
|
| 8. Smother the events in the language of attack
| 147
|
| 9. Using language to generate empathy
| 148
|
| 13. Language and Ethics
| 142
|
| 14. Ethics Placebos, Rationalizations, and Excuses
| 149
|
|
|
