Maps of Meaning The Architecture of Belief — Jordan Peterson
Chapter 1. Maps of Experience: Object and Meaning
Very short summary
The world can be validly construed as 1) object or 2) action, i.e.,
- the theories and methods of science as a place of things or
- the arts or humanities as a forum for meaningful action
Both domains must be used to form a complete picture of the world, which is only possible if they are clearly distinguished from each other.
#Fig1
The Domain and Constituent Elements of the Known p.15
Everything is word. Therefore the most fundamental error is that something is not what it is (whatever word it is, and so ultimately word), but is, namely "exists." Existential experience and science are therefore subjective in terms of (therefore mere) words, which by pharmakon raises its ugly head, that the bullshit deficiency of word is humanity's fault, i.e., human subjectivity (as junkie fallacy, zombie self-deception and criminal mental disorder).
#Fig2
The Metamythological Cycle of the Way p.17
The explicit and the implicit are what we cannot see (culture) or what we cannot understand (chaos), namely existence, which together are the nonsense that is the mayhem.So too common social status, meaning or value of things. It is couched in the bullshit that it too is but incomplete reference to what it really is.
?<"existence" explains word, whereby word "functions" in only incompletely referencing experience (the empirical, known).>
Umberto Echo's abduction is the metamythological cycle of the way.
Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language—fig 1.3
Deduction
| Induction
| Abduction
|
|
---|
Rule
| Rule
| Rule
| ↑
|
↓
| ↑
| ↓
| ↑
|
Case
| Case
| Case
| ↑
|
↓
| ↑
| ↓
| ↑
|
Result
| Result
| Result
| ↑
|
Graham Harman: Object-Oriented Ontology?
Pages Linking to This Page
|