|
Blog 23.03 |
You mentioned earlier that the superverse is not a widely recognized scientific term. Thad Roberts uses the word in Einstein's Intuition for the field of higher dimensionality, i.e., nine spatial and two temporal dimensions constituting eleven dimensions in which light is modeled traveling in a straight line. My speculative philosophical interpretation is that it is because "force" is a concept substituting for parameters hidden from the perspective of only three spatial and one temporal dimension, which is responsible for the phenomenon of viewing different things as the same thing from different perspectives. Why "existence" is the bullshit explanation of word Existentially (cosmo, onto or epistemo logically) word is not a singularity. It is a point, point-i. The idea that it is an approximation ultimately a singularity is the error "existence." The cancellation of persistence As the imaginary (phase state) sustained (persistent, durable category, enduring suffering) bullshit, "existence," yet anything but this, here, now, displacement and absement, like velocity and absity, and acceleration and abseleration, are said to have each other. Wrong. They are each other in that they are word. Ronald Green Is the world going to the dogs? Infinitely worse than the dogs. |