|
Blog24.05 |
What the real drivelous (disjunctive) nonsense is. struction—ChatGPT Struction refers to the process or act of constructing or building something, typically physical structures or systems. It involves organizing and shaping various elements or components together to create a coherent whole. Struction can also refer to the arrangement or organization of parts within a particular system or framework. Overall, struction encompasses the concepts of design, assembly, arrangement, and creation in various contexts. Roland Mann, Please describe what you meant when you said, “The problem of location of that which is everywhere.” I think what you mean is that if there is no observer, i.e., a location of the experience, it has no location and cannot be an event. I am answering that location and event are symbolic*—like every point that everything else is—including the supposedly non-symbolic, the icon and index (re. Peirce). The symbolic category or set invariably includes both icon and index for its virtuous and practical struction of form as universal constants and laws. That does not mean it is icon or index to any personal affect or cybernetic effect (both symbolic) not symbol. The same for anything else, typically in some spiritual realms of what it all is, the error is that it is supercedes symbol. The traditional universal error is that word is God's Word and hence that we have and are souls in His Image. The new error is secular, namely that we are fundamentally “mental” and thus “psychic.” The psychology (about psyches) is a psychologistic cacophony of technocratic errors the likes of which no history has ever seen. The horror is that the secular in its vervor to maintain super-symbolic location, is the void that no God can fill. And certainly not some posthuman AI. If you think I’m agitating for faith. Exactly not. God and the psyche are super-symbolic homuncular crutches to maintain the error that some location (self-not-symbol) produces symbol. That is why I call the point-definition that we may conclude that the symbol is, the nondescript point, “point-i.” The symbol is the identity that as point is to any intension and extension utterly the identity that every historical universe of the inclusive and the exclusive is. It is reality, which is the very crux of the virtuous and practical. Any discussion further than that it and the discussion are symbol, is what is the drivelous (disjunctive) nonsense. * Symbol. Nothing is ever the same thing. The question of the cosmic origin and thus absolute location as if beyond word, of the virtuous and practical struction in and about everything is moot, because it is symbol, i.e., word. Nothing more than word can be said about the point that everything is. The denial that it is word is the stupefying elaboration by minimization or demonization that is the mayhem. Yes, everyone represents a different history, but every point of history whole or part is exclusively symbol and never the same thing. That the process of its finding as event is iconic, indexical or symbolic does not mean every point that it is, is not without exception symbolic. |