Recent Changes - Search:

Blog24.04

Today: Nov 21, 2024white bgcolor=#4169e1 padding=3px

Mar April May
S M T W T F S
31 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11

< 0414 | 0415 | 0417 >


0415#t0100

Absement Positively is the Point

Word is not contradiction other than implying subjectivity supposedly about non-word, i.e., as mere reference to referent.

The error is the idea that the point is not absement as positively what the point is, but that absement is what is absent or the incompleteness of the point, which is not sign of change in the meta-reality, but escalation into the abyss.

The infinitesimal point enabling integration of word as supposed derivative subjectivity or incompleteness is the self-contradiction that is the error. The point is not the error. The idea that something approximating the point is the point and that it is merely subjective, subject and incomplete is the error.

Everything is word. Word is reality. Reality is not approximate. It is what anything is.


0415#t0200

Special relativity “space”time is unity idiotic hindsight wisdom

We are suffering the chronic distortion of the proper direct interchangeability of displacement (x) and time (t) by the multidimensionality of x, but not t. Is there even a phenomenon definable as the multidimensionality of time, and why is its development not symmetrical with that of 3d displacement, i.e., “space,” the bodily fallacious monstrosity “in” time (in terms of a single timeline)?

The error is the explanation that things exist, rather than that they are virtual. That things are virtual, i.e., that they are a symbolic point as thereby not representing a variable, but directly symbolic definition, including “variable,” i.e., anything or everything is word. Thus the error of absolute overreach (autocracy or technocracy) and bias by which "space" is the fundamental 3rd order (3d) of displacement, but time is 1st order, 1d of time passed.

The problem for the ontological and epistemological currency,“existence” is that x and t are absolutely interchangeable, not just metaphorically. The symbolic point is reality, and it is reality as word definition. Coming after the fact analyzing what happened is utter distortion by psychological confirmation bias. Such distortion is exactly the error “existence” constituted in terms of scientific empiricism that is the integration of the abysmally idiotic construction of hindsight wisdom as The Word.


0415#t0300

Ever more complexity is psychological denial of general relativity simplification concluding that the explanation force and the bullshit empowering feminism are the same metastatic crap.


0415#t0400

Relative perspective is psychological, no, psychologistic distortion.


Edit - History - Print - Recent Changes - Search
Page last modified on April 16, 2024, at 06:11 AM