|
Blog24.04
|
The integration of time as “existence” is massive error Everything is a point. Reality is virtual. Any mass moves through spacetime literally relative to what light speed (c) is. Motion is projection of light at lightspeed, which is absolutely exactly what light is not. If it were a matter of action, i.e., the agent and subject is light, the speed of light (supposedly to itself) is instantaneous displacement (time a point) across any distance. So, to light what is time? A mathematical point. Any order of displacement (cosmic derivative or integral) is not any ontologically quantifiable thing, and therefore also not any epistemological thing. The cosmos is unity ideal, and the error that it is includes the ideas, mind, consciousness and psyche. The integrals of displacement are temporal (t) dimensions (orthogonal points) in terms (definition) of displacement. They, and not the derivatives of displacement, are what massive physical reality by definition (like but not “figure of speech”) is, and massive reality (physical mass) is absolutely virtual. Reality is virtual. The relevant universal point is time. Where the universe (light) is the supposed subject (observer), literally each time is the point. The integration of time is virtual. The infinitely massive error is that it is relativistically “derived” as something in some quantifiable order of derivative displacement in derivative time that when integrated, “exists.” “Light” is a word The speed of “light” (as utterly what light intrinsically is not) is the frequency of the cosmos, which means absolutely that reality is virtual and that the explanation “existence” is entropic or metastatic bullshit. Anything in terms of itself is a mathematical point of time, i.e., word. We can posit any of these 8 orders of spacetime integration or differentiation* from its own perspective. i.e., as the position or displacement in question, i.e., some unit length or distance at some time (point). I find that striking. Anything in terms of itself is a time-point, which is exactly what light is. The speed of light from its own perspective is not even beyond infinite. It is whatever everything is, which is word. * Abserk, abseleration, absition, absement, displacement, velocity, acceleration and jerk. Everything from its own perspective, including light is at once the mathematical point of time and everything that it is, i.e., some definitional currency. Any integration of points of time is not “existence.” It is the point that anything is by which everything in terms of itself is word, and in terms of light as itself, is but the cosmos. A photon is timeless, massless, length-less, charge-less and temperature-less. It is idea. The idea existence is based on dynamic spacetime quantization by differential integration relative to the speed of light. Yet — I quote from the top result in the Google search today: A photon can't be measured in terms of size like we might measure other particles. This is because a photon has no mass and thus no size, giving it the same dimensions as a point in geometry. Photons are quanta of light, simultaneously existing as both particles and waves. The idea that measurement is more than a time, i.e., is ontologically integrated, is immeasurable error. By the way, any order of so-called empirical investigation of the hydraulic properties of the physical cosmic vacuum medium is more light on the matter, which is the point. It is not existence. The five basic measurable quantities each have so-called "natural" limits, so the what? The idea that it is more than the point each time is immeasurably the error. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||