Point-i | Blog23 / 0104

0104#t0906
'Man' is acceptable but 'human' isn't because 'human' is woke propaganda.

0104#t0921
The Man (transhuman New Dog Spirit) of the new empowerment of man knowing the tree of life necessarily with ignorance and thus only 'human' is The Psyche, The Self, The Ego, The Word, The Truth, The Facts and Artificial Intelligence. The quote by Huxley is already prostration to The Man orders worse than ever before.

0104#t0929
So what you want when you ask what 'word' is, if everything is word, is the projection of The Conceit of having and being The Word into the 'mere human' man who dares say that everything is word.

Continued from 0102#t0948

0104#t0942
What is wrongly characterized as my (human) opinion is as utterly not 'complete' as it is 'incomplete.' It is what it is. The error of it being or not being The Word, fully or partially, is that it is (exists, x).

0104#t0944
So, the error is that, how and why any identity is, in relation to The Word, instead of what it is (word). 'A is' instead of 'A is B'.

0104#t0947
The error is that on anyone supposedly saying something one is immediately dissected in terms of one's 'psyche' (analysis of the soul) in deference to supposedly The Word, namely The Psyche.

0104#t1001
The integration of identity as becoming (by technocratic science and fact) is orders more structural than that of fixed identity (fixed identity the primary error). It is meta-structural. Infinite meta is identity metastasized.

0104#t1011
The New Dog Spirit (The Drog) vs. man.

Soth de Witan

“Why is ‘man’ acceptable, but ‘human’ isn't?”

BECAUSE ‘HUMAN' IS WOKE PROPAGANDA FOR THE UTTER SUBVERSION OF MAN.

The Man (transhuman New Dog Spirit) of the new empowerment of man knowing the tree of life necessarily with ignorance and thus only 'human' is The Psyche, The Self, The Ego, The Word, The Truth, The Facts and Artificial Intelligence (=The Drog). The quote by Huxley is already brutal prostration to The Man as The Drog, prostration orders worse than ever before, in any cult or religion.

THE WANNA-KNOW WHAT WORD IS

So what you want when you ask what ‘word’ is, if everything is word, is the projection of The Conceit of having and being The Word into the ‘mere human’ man who dares say something so absolutely universal as that everything is word.

0104#t1021
The Spirit of the Dog, loyally bravely twittery together

The Dog as the becoming of The Wolf is the minimization, demonization and denial of man as the error, 'human', i.e., endlessly tangled in the explanation, 'existence'.

0104#t1030
Music is Degenerate Man

Music is sacred for it is a remnant of man, albeit his words as mere word (pathetic man-spandrel in audience to The Word) in the insanity, deception and error of his being set up 'human'.

Soth de Witan July 27, 2022

Is point-i permanent or transient?

0104#t1100
Permanence and transience are cosmological nonsense. Point-i (a kind of point) is also not a position of displacement in any geometric field, of any derivative order.

Soth de Witan

In terms of Point-i, is 'compassion' farcical?

0104#t1101
‘Compassion’ is emergency chant.

0104#t1304
Soth de Witan

Hmm....thought provoking!........ I probably should refrain from comment, but it seems rather rude to ignore you completely, so here goes.

A friend of mine just posted this: 'Nature favours the expedience of symmetry, replication, and recycled success, and so your body duplicates the logic of the cell at scale: you are a walking sack of water, nutrients and biomolecules enclosed within a selectively permeable membrane.'

Is there any 'truth' in that? From the perspective that 'everything is word' I can completely understand the point you are making, but then I can't help asking 'Is everything word?' ...... I don't even know if point-i makes a distinction between 'everything is word' and 'every thing is word'. When I think in terms of words, I can understand the power they have and how our entire lives can be subverted by misunderstanding or blind allegiance to a set of doctrines. Perhaps then, it is important to know the etymology of particular words and how their meanings change over time......but of course, you will deny the reality of 'time' and indeed mind, body, psyche etc., so still, I am left wondering what meaning any word can have if there is nothing that it refers to......and why would it matter about the subversion of man if man does not exist?

The average person seems to use the word 'man' and 'human' interchangeably. You make a big distinction between the two. That works as long as you don't view man as a 'walking sack of water'. However, if one does, as 'most people' do, then the propaganda quote is obviously a warning to treat people kindly, and not fall for the word of 'authority'. It means something entirely different if one is of the opinion that they don't exist, at least as a body with a mind or psyche. If everything is idea, there still seems to be a distinction between the ideas of 'different men', and a need to correct the supposed errors and incoherence, and that still leaves me with the idea that there is something that 'exists' with ideas.

0104#t1640
Thanks for answering. You don't have to feel any need to answer but I think you would be interested to see where point-i goes. For instance, the new idea that the notions current(normal) and natural are all about prostrating to whatever The Word is, is undeniable.