|
Blog 23.08 |
The meaning of dolphin clicks are hard to get right as what dolphins mean to communicate because they do not form symbols. They are indices. Re. Charles Peirce: the icon, index and symbol. The only way a click or an index is a symbol is because it is a human word. It is no such thing for dolphins. About the implication that we (humans) do not understand dolphin "communication," as if in some sense it is some form of higher intelligence than that of humans. Dolphin understanding of humans approaches zero. It should not even qualify as understanding (or communication). Next to that human understanding of dolphins is vast, because is symbolic. Dolphins do not communicate in the least like humans do. They do not communicate. Their vocalization is indexical. The erroneous myth of broad human-like intelligence in animals or the cosmos, e.g., not understanding dolphin "communication," hence whereby humans are endlessly paradoxically set up to conveniently minimize (to maximize) each other and themselves, is a cacophony of errors, namely the beautifully farcical stuff current progressivists marvel over as "complexity." It is like the fact that no one has ever measured the one-way speed of light whereby cosmology, ontology and epistemology consist of 100% ad hoc hypotheses, i.e., the intersubjective complexities of existence and agency. The error is most generally the convention that the two-way measurement of the speed of light is the same as any (one-way) speed of light, re. time-dilation and length contraction ad hoc confirming lightspeed as the constant, c, along with the host of thus also nonsense physical units and constants based on it. No wonder scientists are averse to the philosophies of science behind their science. They at least sense they cannot see other than at the very point (where or when) they are, which is not seeing or sensing at all. The only consistency is that everything is such point, which is the symbol as nothing but itself. But according to the explanation existence and agency it is all confirmation that it has to be (more than that). Therefore the holiness of the brutal complexity. (Gödel) Incompleteness is the Bullshit Inversion That is the Mayhem The reason the logical system necessarily is incomplete, is that the idea that it or anything it represents exists, is wrong. "Existence" is the bullshit that is the mayhem. The derivative (some bit approaching zero on the contour of its supposedly integral cosmological landscape) is necessary, for the inversion necessary for the bullshit explanation, "existence" and humanity's various levels of insignificance relative to it. It is by the derivative and its inversion that the cosmological, ontological and epistemological system as such, in terms of its existence approaches infinite completeness, instead of in terms of existence in general, literally "being" the unity absurdity nothing. The Derivative Erroneously Derives in the Symbol The existential inversion of 1) the symbol as everything because everything (named phenomenon) is it, to some token or derivative snippet of "existence" and 2) such existence, thereby itself everything, i.e., "the universe," is the error that is the mayhem. Change is the utter and total slow cancer Sorry On top of continuing to assault Trump, the piece of shit AI is reigniting masks and mass anonymous insurgent communist riot and insurrection for the presidential election. Of all things in the space or time error, "existence," man (Adam) is closest to word. ::: Space, time, charge, mass and temperature. |