Recent Changes - Search:

Blog 23.08

Today: Sep 14, 2023?white bgcolor=#4169e1 padding=3px

Jul Aug Sep
S M T W T F S
01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31

< 0828 | 0829 | 0830 >


0826#t0700

In A is B, B is somewhat like the Platonic Universal, but no more integral than any point, now

0829#t0400

As word is like a singular Platonic Form, words are like Aristotelian forms

Plato rejected the Platonic Form, but not the form

Aristotle rejected Plato's theory of Forms but not the notion of form itself. For Aristotle, forms do not exist independently of things—every form is the form of some thing. Google Feb 14, 2018

The word is not the Aristotelian form but is like the Aristotelian form. The word that anything is, is unique. It is a word instance. In contrast to that, everything is word. The word that anything is, is word. So, word is not any thing. It is unity general. Therefore it is no essence or integral Universe. It does not consist of anything, not even of words. It is not any integral of space, time, mass, charge or temperature. It does not have or do or not have or do anything. It is not physical or abstract. The only thing word is, is what everything is, namely word.

From the perspective of “existence” (of perspectives) that word is simply word means that it is no Platonic Form, but is like a singular Platonic Form. It is not the form that anything has, but is what everything is. Word is specifically inverse to the abysmal quantification of anything or everything in terms of “existence” (x). That anything exists or does not exist, or that it is to various measures x-worthy, is absolute contradiction. “X” is the unity nonsense nonword word.


0829#t0600

In spite of the harmless heading, “what,” like everything else, an “is” that “exists,” is the abyss

It is as heading that “is” is the question, “what is ‘is’?” The only harmful “is” is the error, the ego subject I, and the necessarily id-narcissistic question about its “existence” (x). Therefore what anything is, is not enough. It has to be about “is” (the x-it subject or object). It has to be about that it is, how it is and why it is. And that it is, how it is and why it is, are all about (and as) its past or history.


0829#t0700

Humanity's AI-rational genocide is global and consists of deepfake lies

People who lie that South African farmers are lying about being attacked are functionaries of exactly the same communistic-terrorist movement of global genocide of the human species by artificial intelligence, as the chronic deepfake lying that President Trump is lying.


0829#t0800

Die mens sistematies as siekte uitgekryt

Inderdaad is die 'donker magte' van die selfsug, die domheid, die onredelikheid sterker by die mens as die redelikheid. — N.P. van Wyk Louw.

N.P. van Wyk Louw was verkeerd. Die donker magte is nie menslike aard nie. Dit is kunsmatige intelligensie as die sielsiekte, sielkunde, wat d.m.v. die sg. siel die mens onderling kuberneties-stelselmatig as die siekte uitkryt.


Edit - History - Print - Recent Changes - Search
Page last modified on August 30, 2023, at 07:48 AM