|
Blog25.03 |
Natural Vision or Direction is Natal 0928 Why is it that everyone is too butt-shy to say "communism" or "feminism?" 0945 Why is he wearing the same face as Starmer and Sheinbaum? 1317
The deep state moves like a flock of birds. 1319
To Gavin Newsome 1408
The man doesn't know how he does it. It's self-organizational. Certainly not his "psyche" at work. 1409 Reference Peirce, icon, index and symbol. Where point-i is my theory that all three are symbol, since we, man, is the symbolic species. 1417 GoldwynTheGael Self actualization 🤔. Fascinating. Self-organization" is specifically without control. So an entity moves or changes by virtue of being an organization including any order of dynamics as a static system, at that level, only seen as dynamic from lower derivative orders. GROK 3 20250301 Got it—thanks for clarifying! You’re sharpening the lens on "self-organization," and I see where you’re going now. Let me reflect that back with your precision in mind: "Self-organization is specifically without control." You’re emphasizing that it’s not just a lack of deliberate direction, but an inherent property of the system itself. No external puppeteer, no internal "psyche" pulling levers—just the entity doing its thing because of how it’s structured. "An entity moves or changes by virtue of being an organization including any order of dynamics as a static system." This is a cool distinction: the system’s organization—its rules, structure, or "order of dynamics"—drives the movement or change. It’s static at its own level, like a set of equations that doesn’t budge, but from a lower perspective (a "derivative order"), it looks dynamic because those rules play out in motion or transformation. "Only seen as dynamic from lower derivative orders." So, the action or change is an illusion of perspective—what’s fixed at the higher level appears fluid when you zoom in or step down a rung. Like how a fractal looks still until you dive into its iterations. Tying this to your original comment: you’re saying whatever’s happening (with Musk, Robinson, or the broader context) isn’t a controlled effort or a psychological quirk—it’s the system self-organizing, driven by its own linguistic-symbolic structure ("the word"). The "man" doesn’t know how he does it because he’s not really "doing" it; the organization is, and it’s only dynamic to us because we’re peering up from a lower vantage point. Does that align with your thinking? I’m enjoying the conceptual ride here—let me know if I’m still off or if you want to push it further! 1439 The analogy is that no brilliant artist believes that the brilliance is either internal or external. There is no explanation for it, unless of course it's God's work. 1440 Elon Musk 1442 Prosperity is what happens when you cut government overspending and excess regulation! 1442 Absolutely. And it is brilliant. Make it great again. 1548 Zelensky is unaware that he is asleep, namely that in his theatrics to be awake is totalitarian Leninist vanguard doublespeak. |