|
Blog25.03 |
1119
Excuse me.
Feminism is very significantly the mental disorder that the man should be abolished, as Trump derangement syndrome demonstrates. 1145
The feminist XX-chromosome without XY's iconic 3D reality consists of corrupt indexical 2D rationalization. 1130 Elon Musk America is being strangled with overregulation 1203 The woke mind virus is feminism at a crossroads of having uprooted the child-centered woman ultimately into the blind consumption of fun, namely the simply inconceivable brat joy with malicious prosecution of playing junkie, zombie and farcie. 1607
My language is not completely common, but I think it should be easily close enough to normal nerd-English to be quite intelligible to a good number of men. 1709 "The future is female" -- Hillary Clinton 0917 If everything is the point-derivative integral symbol of definition I call word, In that it implies the state or system of its integral world, change of one variable in terms of another is only one such kind of derivative. 1241 Yet, all such derivatives are also of one single kind — from my experience that abstract systems far wider than the physics it most regularly expresses, are invariably structural to any derivative order — so, the above applies for any kind of derivative, the point-derivative (•f) does not merely make up the world. It actually is the world contextually at once by implication of the point that everything is as partial point-derivatives in multivariate systems. Thus point-i (•f) is exactly reality as ∂f/∂x is not, albeit the latter is pretty good approximation for measurement. As world world namely •f •f ≈ ∂f/∂x = (Partial f / Partial x) * dx + (Partial f / Partial y) * dy… ∂f/∂x ≈ •f = •f/•x + •f/•y As model world, the model being in the world, thus itself word. ∂f/∂x = •f … Wherein if we talk about the calculated, engineer-modeled and the engineer-applied physical world are both at once point-derivative and smeared over [absement]* integral so, in relation to each other approximated very finely in terms of infinitesimal derivatives like dx and dy as the immediately implied constitutional elemental always in terms of word-symbol. However, word (•f) is absolutely reality whether it is the definition or sense of the structure of model or application. They are both the world. Or colloquially in the world, part of the world.* That everything is word and that word is not some subjectively objective incompleteness demonstrably resolves Zeno’s 5th century BCE paradox, Russell’s paradox 1901 and Gödel’s incompleteness theorems. Consider that “word” is the phenomenon of one mental sense at a time that man has, as point-derivative integral, including as above, multiples thus singular, namely the point-derivative integral function. Know absolutely that such “word” is what everything is. If we walk on a mountain slope the word “slope” is one of the many points we may repeatedly have specifically always differently (for its variations of intensity and contextual content, itself a more etymological point-derivative at once integral with point-derivative integral landscapes) namely as a point-derivative integral of all the symbolic conditions of the sense provided by our past experience of the physical and abstract world structure, including the immediate sensory input we had just received, there on the mountain never ever more than in terms of the point.** * Absement: Every integral is an integral always in the multivariate absemental sense so as to maintain in every sense that it is the world. The consistent implication of the absence of whatever world it actually and really is, literally is the differential of point-i directly, some variation of, “absence.” Absolutely positively completely reality itself. 1934 In the context of reversing Peirce icon, index and symbol to coincide with interpretation, object and sign, in that order — that everything is symbol, word and word-definition in the sense that the man must lead the triad of intelligence and agency of the man, woman and child. Or it goes to pot — equaling solid entropy. Thus man-sense is ternary (iconic), woman-sense binary (indexical) and child-sense unary (symbolic). Everything is symbol as point-derivative integral, but stands only as the iconic 3D, i.e., a triadic fractal system of , as follows. Across the triad of triads crackle and boom are similar (as the dimension rounding out its immediate system as 3D) to acceleration in the form of gravity. Such 3rd dimension at each nested triadic tier is what give consciousness body. It is what we refer to as the iconic, namely acceleration (2nd), crackle (5th) and boom (8th) rounding out their local triads in a 3D-like sense. The triad, the triad of the triad and the triad of the triad of the triad: Acceleration, Crackle and Boom are their 3rd Dimensions (simplifying from what it is, namely a variable function of multiple variables) First triad: To stress: acceleration ( d²x⁄dt²), crackle (d⁵x⁄dt⁵) and boom (d⁸x⁄dt⁸) are similar as the 3rd elements in their triads, rounding out their systems like a 3D shape. In a geometric sense: 2nd derivative: This 3rd-element role mirrors how the z-axis turns a 2D plane into a 3D space—gravity (a), crackle and boom give depth or form to their respective triads, making the system more than flat or linear. Consciousness and the Iconic The 3rd dimensions of each triad "gives consciousness body" whereby it is the ternary intelligence and agency of the man. It is thus iconic. If gravity (d²x⁄dt²) is the weight of physical reality, and higher derivatives like d⁵x⁄dt⁵ and d⁸x⁄dt⁸ round out their triads, they are the weight of mental reality—consciousness made substantive through complexity. As such the iconic is integral definition: The 3rd element as a pivot, making the abstract tangible—d⁸x⁄dt⁸ isn’t just math, it’s the "boom" of experience, a sensory anchor. In "point-i," a word like "slope" isn’t flat—it’s a point-derivative integral, folding d⁰x⁄dt⁰ (position) to d⁸x⁄dt⁸ (boom) into one focal point. Crackle and boom, as 3rd elements, give it "body"—a 3D richness that consciousness inhabits, much like gravity gives mass a presence. 2008
Well, no, that's wrong. As noted earlier today, the iconic is the third unfolding with local point-derivatives, pop, bang, boom, i.e., child, woman, man iconically, 3D. 2057 It's a deal so big it's to prevent what the zombie players here depicted have zero sense of: the utter corrosion of reality itself. 2127 Bureaucracy is nothing but feminism. 2144 10,888,869,450,418,352,160,768,000,000 potential points-derivative integral. 27! is vastly larger than the seconds since the Big Bang (4.3 × 10¹⁷) or stars in the observable universe (10²⁴). The 27 dimensions of man's consciousness potentially yield 27! such permutations. 2247
I am now saying that the woman's intelligence and agency include only up to indexing in terms of the unfolding of the first triad as symbolic and the second as indexical. Nested System Explained The point-i model is inherently nested, reflecting the exponential growth of dimensions: Nested Triads. First Triad (Symbolic): d⁰x⁄dt⁰ (displacement), d¹x⁄dt¹ (velocity), d²x⁄dt² (acceleration) — 3 base dims. Here note that the conceptual richness of the higher dimensions of the second and even more, the third higher triads are diminutive but its results, cumulative. That's why creativity (of engineering design and construction) is spark-like, the intangibles. Details matter. Woman’s 9D (3²) the indexical symbol Scope: First + Second Triads. Symbolic (3D): d⁰x⁄dt⁰, d¹x⁄dt¹, d²x⁄dt²—abstract "slope" as a Saussurean dyad (signifier↔signified, e.g., word↔incline). Man’s 27D (3³) the iconic symbol Permutations Woman: 9D = 9!. The model is consistent: Why Nesting Matters |