|
Blog25.03 |
1210
The feminine is conservative, connective, relational: it amplifies what already is.
Feminism is its direct inversion, subversion, corruption. 1214 Feminism is the man turned inside out. It is the sheer demonically secular satanic that breaks down everything that the iconic intelligence and agency of the man engineers and builds. 1219 Feminism and not the man is in every brutal way it can possibly happen the psychotic entity that has been assaulting the woman, from the beginning of the simple error that the iconic is also the domain of the woman. 1944 The über-triadic Musk. 1957 Finally. The spade beginning to be called a spade. 1930 The contextual integral of reality doesn't all collapse into the symbol as “mere” symbol, with “humanity” fallen in the broken objectivity of its subjectivity. It is the symbol. The symbolic integral (similar to what we colloquially call “meaning”) is the absolute universal context that is what everything consists of, given that word (the symbol) at once is whatever it is. Everything is symbolic, the symbol, word. In that we all remain in some capacity child, our reality is fundamentally symbol. Everything is symbol, but the child is symbolic symbol, that is, simple symbol (simple word). Word as such is highly recursive in any possible way of recursion. The symbol, index and icon map onto the sign, object and interpretation in that order, which is kind of the inverse of Peirce's more untethered abstract pragmatism. If the symbol is a point-derivative that at once is its integral the symbol can be directly (by definition, by virtue of being definition) any combination of symbol, index and icon and any format of static or dynamic, i.e., any derivative order. Mankind's intelligence and agency (same thing, really) are ternary: very different for the man, woman and child. To deny that is the psychosis that we are suffering and I do call that error, "feminism." With time the triad folds and unfolds recursively in reality as pure language development in the sense that its true worldly expression is not the symbol as mere reference to referent relational 2-fold, but the iconic consistency of its 3-fold recursion symbol, index and icon in that the symbol is symbol, the index is symbol and the icon is symbol, the latter the far end and the base the near end of the recursion of word's natural world. Thus icon is the highest form of the symbol but it too is symbol. The man is the only intelligence that as sheer word, descends, it would be in the normal vernacular like Peirce's hierarchy into the iconic. But it is not a descent. The mature man recursively ascends to the iconic by which he is iconic, does iconic and speaks iconic. The woman’s recursion is only 2-fold. It is recursive through two levels: the indexical and the symbolic. Her symbol is not iconic. It ascends to, peaks and is centered in the sensation (normally develop feminine) or sensationalism (feminist-corrupted) of the indexical symbol (the index). It is binary, more like semiotics (de Saussure) than semiosis (Peirce). The beautiful insight of that argument (point-i) is that it truly ties the abstract to the physical and both to reality, the world, the universe/cosmos. If the derivative and symbol are the same thing and everything is word, the recursion is not back to any mere icon Peirce might say belongs to lower animals, or to any mere index he might say belongs to higher animals. Everything consists of a system of nested triads of higher symbolic order similar to Peirce, one that is not mere mental gymnastics like Peirce, but a pragmatism of reality itself in which the man and the woman have, negotiate and trade very distinctly different landscapes. It is not the insufferable zero sum game feminism chronically arranges as if promoting the absolute disintegration of human pairing. The natural masculine derivative orders contain the point-derivative symbol through 3 tiers, up to 27 dimensions, no more than 27 are necessary, nested 3³. Each of the 27 derivative orders consists of phenomena unique to itself. They are the forward-looking triad-nested time derivatives of displacement-as-geometric form to any dynamic order by recursion also as the time-integrals of displacement: absement, absity, abseleration,… evoking the past. The 0th, 1st and 2nd point-derivatives integral form the dimension or symbol-symbol, spacetime, but it is sheer potential. It is what the child is, does and thinks in his job to become a man or woman. It is the potential for acquiring doing and being 3 kinds of symbols: the symbolic symbol, the indexical symbol and iconic symbol. The 3rd, 4th and 5th derivatives are those of the indexical woman. Each of the dimensions of her triad (3) consists of 3 dimensions, thus 3²=9 dimensions (but only, by its relational linguistic unfolding, in the indexical sense of the symbol). Such index is what it is as symbol, the indexical symbol. So, in that, the 1st of the tw0 unfoldings of normal the symbolic 3D or 9d of the woman’s domain (the indexical symbol) is naturally sensation-based. The 2nd unfolding reveals the three dimensions of the iconic each nesting the 9 dimensions of the indexical, thus, 3²*3=3³=27 total dimensions. It is what the man is, does and thinks. It includes the 6th, 7th and 8th derivative. (pop, bang, boom), each including the 3rd, 4th and 5th derivative (the jerk, snap, crackle of the indexical of the woman), which in turn each includes the 0th, 1st and 2nd. (displacement, velocity and acceleration/gravity of the base symbolic of the child). 2133 From the very first beginning of language the woman (and thereby the man) was artificial. As language emerged, feminism messed up the child's symbolic potential trying to step into the man's iconic domain, seriously spoiling her natural species-specific relationship to the child. |