|
Blog 23.02 |
“Kant is puerile logic, but Hegel is no more than a sketch” — Charles S. Peirce After three years of intense study of Kant, Peirce concluded that Kant’s system was vitiated by what he called its “puerile logic,” and about the age of 19 he formed the fixed intention of devoting his life to the study of and to research in logic. Peirce, then, had early and deep disagreements with Kant’s position about logic, and he never altered his view that Kant’s view of logic was superficial: “… he [i.e. Kant] never touches this last doctrine [i.e. logic] without betraying marks of hasty, superficial study” (Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volume 2, Section 3; hereafter such Collected Papers references will be cited as as CP, 2.3). Even worse, Peirce held, was the Logik of Hegel: Kant’s fault “… is a hundredfold more true of Hegel’s Logik … . That work cannot justly be regarded as anything more than a sketch” (CP, 2.32). The great unit of Peirce problematics is the dicisign (sic) i.e., whose object "exists," af. “A dicisign is a sign whose proper interpretant represents the object of the sign to be different from the sign itself, but ignores the distinction between the sign and its interpretant.” Charles S. Peirce, 1903. It seems that ai knows Ai or religion * 0215#t1800.01 X is the contradiction, "existence." Ai is the human idiocy infinity abyss. |