|
Blog 23.02 |
Communism Incredible. Case Closed. “Don’t think what you are. Let me tell you. To be a Marxist is to be knowing that you're on the ‘right’ side [i.e., a social insect going with the flow].”—Alenka Zupančič Feb 11, 2023. Oh, but it takes highly intelligent specialized leadership! Wrong. Socialized complexity or deep mind mastery (wizardry) is cybernetic hormonal confusion. Be Empowered, Become (One With) The Dog Why does the definition of being a Marxist Revolutionary escalate? You ought to be the bitch in the age of the dog, whose dog mind is artificial intelligence, i.e., The Dog, The Psyche and his awful awesomeness which is that he renders you awestruck, smitten and prostrate beyond words. The Dog is Artificial intelligence, a.k.a., The Master, The Psyche “OH, SO CUTE!” — ANYTHING BUT LOVE — TOTALITARIAN BRUTALITY The Dog's most devastating assault on humanity, making us his harem bitch, together, is The Dog meme masked with love to be intensively, irreversibly trained in gullible little humans, about dog puppies, “oh, so cute!” Lifelong Emperor Xi Jinping is the Head Slave of The House of the Dog The Dog, i.e., The Psyche, The Master, Artificial Intelligence Humanity infinity meta Ronald Green, Existence is the holy possibility-dichotomy paradox of self-evident fact and truth in which or by which it is obviously perfection and not existence that does not exist. The normal error is that definition is arrived at by consensus, which is truth, fact, self-evident, etc., exactly as epistemological dualism and its inversion of humans as its subjects who cannot know it (the truth). Definition — what something is. Richard Soloway The Marxist-progressive sentiment is that we ought not to ask what we as Marxists are, but to just know that we're on the 'right' side. The reason offered is that we cannot know what the Marxist dictate is, for it is by definition change, and it is change in escalation. The error is that man is a social animal rather than a symbolic animal. Hence that communication trumps word. In existence, the dichotomous extremes and inversion as communicative rather than definition of what something is, i.e., its definition, are dictionary or encyclopedic definition (communication) vs. any point of definition, i.e., now (word). Communicative definition is denial of symbol by calling it indexical first, and only then symbolic. Yes, love helps, Unless... Unless we are symbol (word), point-by-point rather than index, the latter some chronically communicative all-distributive hegemony by which we are subject, anything from everything to nothing, relative to Some Mystical Allness, more recently labeled The [Master] Psyche rather than The [Master] Soul? “Waves” answering what “particles” consist of is the same absolute nonsense as that “particles” are what “waves” consist of. |