|
Blog 23.04 |
“Universal Grammar (with a capital "U") goes all the way down to chemistry “If you think that language and thought are just arbitrary, | 2:45:34 | a lot of postmodernism sort of went this way, using language as a kind of model. Maybe all of our physical theories, our theories of physics, | 2:45:42 | are just sort of weird thoughts. It doesn't have anything to do with reality. No, in fact, just the opposite. | 2:45:49 | Because of the necessary entanglement of semiosis, that is producing aboutness, | 2:45:56 | that it's always normative, it's always value-laden, | 2:46:02 | and it always feels like something. What we're doing feels like something.” Ronald Green, I hear Terrence Deacon saying that ontology is before epistemology, like you are saying that epistemology is before ontology. As if those are not words. Both views and “view” as such are the wishful thinking that the nonword word “existence” explains word (by its action making it about each other), and that word is thereby only “meaning,” e.g., snapshot aboutness by “approximation.” The derivative orders of space in terms of time, velocity, acceleration and jerk are simply complexified variations of the error that displacement means change or evolution, i.e., existence (instead of point-i, and word). It doesn't matter how deep the rational or affective complexity goes, or at what level of emergent complexity the so-called focus of the so-called point-of-view in terms of "existence" is, it does not show that displacement is not utterly word. It does not show that anything, no matter what it is, in any supposed aspect whatsoever, is not utterly word. https://youtu.be/PqZp7MlRC5g?t=9931 (2:45:31) |