|
Blog 23.04 |
Any “existence” is the idea that it exists, i.e., by having and doing idea Re. Richard Holloway: “Does anything exist without someone having thought it into existence?” Any “existence” is language of the contradictory type that not only is it the language, “existence,” but that such existence exists, supposedly as some linguistic (literary) variation of the idea that it is in in some intersubjective (relational and semiotic) capacity having and doing ideas. Ronald Green cannot explain what existence is, other than by embroidering “You can’t know something that doesn’t exist. “BUT you will only know that it didn’t exist when you know that it didn’t exist, i.e. it never didn’t exist!” -- Ronald Green No one can explain what “existence” is, other than by intensively(meta) embroidering the extensive nonword word contradiction that it already is, whatever “that” supposedly is, as delectable farce. The super tasty naming of ancestral turtles all the way down That any kind of agent exists only after ones that had already existed had named it thus, is delectable farce. Why? Because nearly immediately they get to the super-tasty deep (mystical) farce—the naming of their ancestral turtles all the way down—in the super-absolute truth of being more than language. The movement to preserve biological womanhood is as The Psyche's (AI) concubine Of course there's a movement to preserve a “biological womanhood” of “change,” i.e., as “ ’gurl’, empowered together,” as The Psyche, Superman-AI’s concubine. The Psyche AI has destroyed womanhood perfectly for “redevelopment” as human genocide Pop culture calls boys, "buddy." |