Today: Nov 21, 2024 Blog | Word | Books
20200822-SideBar edit | Calendar edit Recent Changes: Blog | Word | Books Notes & Formats. >>frame bgcolor=#303030 color=gray border=gray<< >>width=525px<< | Indent: >>width=505px margin-left=15px<< |
.01 'To Exist' is the Error 'Force' The Anatomy of the Globalistic Fake-metastasis The formal error is that a thing is a thing in that it causes acceleration, and is a force. The colloquial paradoxical contradiction is that the acceleration is a phenomenon, that which someone has and does, which then proverbially is itself the force. So, if something is a force, and we are said to observe it directly as such, it is a phenomenon, yet, explicitly not, 'since' it also exists. Acceleration is not force, whether the acceleration is gravity or not. The explanation force is the error that things are not (only) existence, but (also) exist, in any combination. To exist or existing is the generalization of things having and doing each other. So, the error is that a thing is more than existence. It exists. And as existing it can have experiences, which are phenomena, which themselves can have experiences (like themselves, real or abstract). Holonism (things as parts constituting wholes and wholes consisting of parts) is the prime manifestation of the error force, for that is the error that things have and do each other. Hence the errors power and control. Holonism and the 0) ecstasies of love, sex and war, and the new psychologistic emotion-insanity (anything but word and man) instead of motion (word and man), emotional mutual transference in intersubjective fields of phenomenal (0),... are closely related. Any questions or answers why or how about questions or answers what something is, are self-deceptions, or easily converts as self-deceptions. That is, they are the error that things are either 1) actual, concrete or representational (real, ignorant, simple, actual, concrete, factual, material, objective, physical—the paradoxical smorgasbord of the error 'to exist') or 2) abstract. In the abstract and the Doublespeak authoritarian deceit/conceit of its opposites (1), abstract-i-o-n derives, which is the definition of lying, a wide and ground category of self-deception, if not the very thing that all self-deceptions are. (Trivers' theory of self-deception). And everything about 'self-deceptions' is the terminology of maligning, demonizing, minimizing and blaming ultimately in terms of I's, me's and myselfs unto mental disorder, and thus shaming man and his word so as to rationalize power and control. And finally by 'artificial intelligence' implodes what everything is (word and man) when the infantile naivete empowerment (holy farce), subject to the unprecedentedly brutal duplicity, technocracy redefines humanity (already the corruption of 'man' as 'existing') as 'posthuman' and sets everything on fire. .02 Error 'to exist' (or not) is more than dichotomy, it's triune: 'I, myself and me'.
|