.01

Probably the key political question of our time is if The Supreme Court or young lawline professionals (freshly intuitive by technocratic indoctrination) ought to ultimately decide what the Law is.

The problem is that the emotional lawline approach is artificial intelligence, namely cybernetics. It is the height of fluidly affective synthetic analysis.

.02

History is time, which is now.
Past, present and future tense are the error to be.

Now is point-i motion or change and is word.

.03

New Facebook Group:Narcissismus

https://facebook.com/groups/narcissismus

This group is for current US and global politics in the context of https://facebook.com/groups/pointi as the point (identity) that everything, whether change or motion, is something and anything whatsoever is no other than word. And most acutely that the idea that word is mere sign referencing agency and action (things beyond word) is the error that is the mayhem.

The point of Narcissismus is that we're on the precipice of metastasis (The Abyss),... not yet metastasized.

.04

Socrates is the epitome of T.S. Eliot's hollow man: universal scapegoat for nothing.

The hollow man scapegoat is the one defined as nothing, in contrast to the one defined on the calamitous foundation of the nothing that "actual reality is," as everything. The ultimate wisdom of such infinite Einsteinian stupidity is that nothing(ness) is everything.

.05

What says Julian Jaynes? What role did Socrates, pre socratic and post socratic Greek philosophers play in the establishment of Jaynesian consciousness?

.06

"We should also remember that Socrates derived some of what I am about to call his 'archaic authorization* from the oracle." ~ J Jaynes

"The constitution of the United States was not, like the fabled Goddess of wisdom, the offspring of a single brain. It ought to be regarded as the work of many heads and many hands." ~ James Madison.

Monotheism and individual agentive consciousness emerged together, supplanting a pantheistic dynamic. The social justice revolution is one step further than individual consciousness. It is the coalescence of individuality into a metastatic blob.

the most acute question so as to be the point is if The Supreme Court or young lawline professionals (intuitive by freshly technocratic indoctrination) ought to ultimately decide what the law is.

The problem is that it is artificial intelligence, namely cybernetics, the height of fluidly affective synthetic analysis.

.07

.08

.09

.10