.01

Explanation is the nonsense of being and purpose.

Re. 20200925.01 Russell Daylight
Semiotics and semiology as separate domains of explanation.

.02

Spoken words are the symbols of mental experience and written words are the symbols of spoken words. Just as all men have not the same writing, so all men have not the same speech sounds, but the mental experiences, which these directly symbolize, are the same for all.

Aristotle, re. Russell Daylight.

.03

The superman (posthuman) holiness is the paradox that nothing is the truth

Specific reference: 20200921.10

More general background summary of yesterday 20200921 (tan).

What is time?

Now is the point-motion that time is, and the gravity that it is, is another point, the point-motion, emotion. The notion that time is inside or outside the point that now is, or anything as inside or outside the point that it is, is the word-contradiction word, 'psychology' with its feelings. Feelings (emotions as what someone or something 'feels') are the word-denial that is the transference of blaming and shaming that is the brutality and the violence. The emotion that the story is that I am a racist and a sexist is not even farce.

For emotion is point-motion and the motion that it is not, that somehow motion is beyond the point, to its inside and outside, is the word-corruption and metastasis of man's 'being' 'in' such geometric space, inevitably mutually held as the scapegoat of that very error itself... first as 'fallen' (human) and then as the error 'human' properly extinct as superman (posthuman).

Facebook.

Existence (things exist by transcending the point) is fake (faceb4truth).

Face-first as in facebook is the logic of duplicity or like 'Corona' the mask of disease and suffering of being responsible for the error, 'human'.

Pierre Rousseau , by again being right and certain, you are confirming my point.

Yes, but explanations how and why things are what they are, are the complex or metaphysical nonsense of some word-transcendent being and purpose.

So, it is all about each of us, mere earthlings, according to Peirce, according to your interpretation, according to Saussure, according to Aristotle, on historically repetitively evolving stacks of symbolization ultimately sign to the common mental experiences of all men as ground the utter bullshit is that we are the very embodiment of human error, having subjective experiences and that language is merely about such word-transcendent experiences, whether spoken or written and so is mere symbol, loosely mathematically symbolized as infinitesimal derivative, or nothingness, in euphemism of the ultimate farce of its inevitable conclusion, which is thereby holy: that nothing is the truth. So in the riot of such mayhem, the point is not meaning, but pointing finger at whatever thereby presumes to be the man.

Note the superman (posthuman) holiness of the paradox that nothing is the truth

Yes, I understand that. And you may have a point.

The error is that the point is not the point that it is, but that it is my point, or that I am the point, and that you're supposed to feel with your litany of emotions whether you should stand under it or not.

.04

.05

.06

.07

.08

.09

.10