Transcript of President Trump's speech on the fraudulent election

.01

At the facebook group Non-dual Conversations

The Semiotician Charles Peirce said that anything is intrinsically triadic, of sign, object and interpretation (icon, index and symbol). The normal and natural way of our looking at the world as supposedly geometric perceiver and perceived in perspective is implied even if it is silent, as the upside-down idea that sign, object and interpretation are nevertheless personified players (subject) by the symbol being the silent sign and the multidimensional graphic (icon) the real or imaginary conceptual interpretation (while the index is still the index).

.02

Peter, Terrence W. Deacon is interesting for mainly two things. 1) That human language is extremely unique and 2) his mention of the Peircean semiotic triad.

The semiotic triad means that everything is point-identity (point-i or pi, not the math term).

Everything is sense(word). If so, what is nonsense? It is nonsense sense or nonword word. The theory pi is that emergence, namely both Western and Eastern versions of being or isness are nonsense.

My March 4, 2019 graphic “to be” reads as follows, with limited comments added today in square brackets.

The idea that the music plays itself (one awareness having many awareness--mind or consciousness--East) is even greater bullshit-as-normal than the idea that someone [or something] is playing the music (many awarenesses having one awareness--materialism--West).

No one or nothing plays the music. Music is point-idea, mempoint or liquid point. The scientific idea “self-organization” as agentive personification is error. Agency is error. The material West and conscious East are [in terms of their own words for error] the same error. The error is “existence” ... and “awareness” (knowing about existence).

Everything is idea, which is existentially a point, and not existence. Existence is contradiction. It is idea as idea-contradiction.

The text needs an update, though.

As far as Deacon goes, I did mention only The Symbolic Species. But what I did not add is that only the three chapters of Part one named Language are relevant (of the three parts). From Incomplete Nature I gleaned that holonism and set theory are nonsense. Something is not the same thing as whole and part, i.e., as integral agent vs elemental process, therefore both agency and process are nonsense.

“No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it's not the same river and he's not the same man.” Heraclitus.

.03

"We need to transcend the 3D and move on to the multidimensional Reality...we need to arrive at 5D, at a minimum."—The New Age Community.

That's simple. Just take the whole 3d as one dimension for every one time dimensions 1t, with volume xyz=X, 1D. So 3D would be XYZ, which is the same as 9d. (xyz)^3 for 2t. Next level: 27d3t and so on ad infinitum. My interpretation is that it is spacetime as word.

That interpretation is about what Thad Roberts did in Einstein's Intuition and A Perfect Universe. So how do I marry Thad's quantum space theory and its physical determinism with the idea that everything is word? By saying that everything is correlation as point-differential and not derivative integration or relationship between different integral ontologies.

Yes, everything is deterministic, but as differential point or sense(word). To analyze parts as aggregated infinitesimal integrals and combine them to form even bigger physical integral wholes, whether variable or unity-ocean is to look at something else altogether.

Namely deconstruction, i.e., synthetic analysis, giving rise to the nonsense "intelligence" or "consciousness/mind."... and I daresay Artificial Intelligence or Nothingness Enlightenment, which therefore is the Abyss.

.04

Anything from its own "perspective" is not existence, but point, also the whole universe. It is only from the integrated geometric perspective of another so-called resolution (of the hierarchical universe) that so-called "emergence" and "perspective" take place.

More ideas on that. The idea that one cannot see oneself for one's "subjectivity" is the deconstructive nonsense that one exists, as perceiver with perception. Any notion of one's parts or content as existing is "the other" which consists of the nonsense of incompleteness and as personal development wisdom leads to being woke, confused and deluded, blissfully suffering together, or Fake News Deus Empowerment, namely the Nothing Abyss.

.05

Oct 11, 2018

"The idea that things are what other things do or have [water is what water molecules do or have] is the infinite regress error."

And from early 2018

Every derivative is superfluid, not only acceleration. It is the emotion-motion point as metaphor that idea is. The idea that acceleration too should be relativized as if any metric as the Planck-scale bits, the quanta are "actual" spacetime or constitute spacetime rather than that they are metaphor as spacetime or conversely that spacetime constitute quanta is the same error as the idea that water molecules constitute water or that water constitutes water molecules. It does not. Water and water molecules are metaphor as each other.

Water molecules are not "actually" water. The only actual thing anything is, is itself, as idea, which is redundancy. The idea that things are "real or unreal" as "[being] actual or not" is bullshit. "Is" is the only coherent verb—AS METAPHOR.

Yes, quanta and the vacuum are each other as metaphor. Idea is symbol-as-metaphor. Idea is the most general category/thing that all categories/things are—which is the statement that they are metaphor—again, as metaphor.

Relations between two points are those points, as metaphor, as the point. The two points are not "actually" constitutive of the relationship, they are not "in" a relationship. As the relation they are the relation-as-metaphor, which is no existential relation. No point is relational or "exist-as-the-action or interaction between points." It is the absolute that every point is as whatis.

.06

.07

.08

.09

.10