01

"Review of parameters not currently explained (in QFT). Intro to quantum fluid dynamics (defining boundary conditions and balances allowed between boundaries). Show how all constants of a Nature (including the mass assignments of the fundamental particles of matter) are set geometrically as these balanced actions." — Proposed lecture subject, Thad Roberts.

The lecture is going to be epic, but as the pointmotion word-structure that existence is, or the what-questions below.

Is bounded rather than constrained space not time form and meaning, rather than 'balanced action'? Is space (and everything) not time (whatever now is), which is symbol and therefore semantic point i.e., meaning or word as the explicit word meaning geometry that all Nature is?

Is set geometry not the point that typical ratio is sufficient, rather than action between types? Are geometrically bound constants symbolically fixed as icon (form) and index (reference), including (re. geometry) differential so-called 'dynamic orders' sufficiently action? Or is action the new bullshit (farce) to explain existence (that of anything at all), as the new Creator explication? Does not the term action introduce escalating insufficiency of terms to what otherwise is the pure ratio of imagery and definition?

Is action not itself the brutal natural and normal necessity for synthetics (synthesis) of authoritarian mutual or common-ground 'trust' (in the high maths of relative value)? Is such digital thunderdome coming to a head resolved or is 'together' the same old ecstasy of love and war finally crossing the dark matter threshold, i.e., ultimate zombie fallacious, junkie self-deceptive and crazy mental disorder facilitation? And utterly euphemistically the ecstasy, mad max on fury road.

Is the terrible breakdown to 'rebuild' by the same old error of trusting final authority not the dystopian martial fields of intersubjective constraint and distrust? Is such ultimate resolution not to the hilt mutually psychologistic transference as human subjectivity, ignorance and artifice? Is such dismal error not the logical necessity for the super-archetypal mythological self confirmation bias and self fulfilling prophecy (holy fake and farce) behind the excuse 'these trying times'? Is it not the rhetorical bullshit (to the full instrumentality of the lie) of keeping you safe, which ultimately is posthumanist artificial intelligence? Is it not mere variation on the End Times theme, which true to its 'actuality' is actually abysmal implosion?

Continued at 05 below.

02

Existence geometry, informal or formal, is word and as more than word, is chaos.

Therefore the holy farce of digital thunderdome and mad max fury road, facilitated by the ecstasies of love and war, a.k.a., 'together'.

03

Word or man as more than word or man is the holy farce of digital thunderdome and mad max fury road, facilitated by the ecstasies of love and war, a.k.a., the mass zombism 'together'.*

* Together: The bullshit that life is a struggle, or that man is fallen, or that humanity is the scourge on the face of the earth, the virus or cancer. While the truth is that everything is word, so that such bullshit is the struggle, the fall, the filth and the virus or cancer.

04

The dismal error is not motion or change, but that motion or change is what something has and does.

05

Balances between boundaries are nouns, not verbs.

The derivatives of position as if they are not structure but higher order namely action is sense self-contradiction, namely nonsense and sentimental sensationalism. They dovetail with higher order logic as the very structure of the informal fallacies (farce) that now are the ecstasies of the digital thunderdome and mad max fury road, i.e., posthumanist artificial intelligence.

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20