.01

Existence is the rabbit hole, that nonsense sense beyond what everything* is.
* everything: pi, sense and word.

.02

As existence is truth (law) (vs lie (crime)), point-i is word (vs existence). However, while existence is truth, death is fake.

Therefore progressivism is the dichotomy existence ("law = crime" (in every sense, which is nonsense)) of hyper-idealism (the next-tier truth-lie of some future end) justifying any constitutional means.

Like the rabbit hole (farce) it is the holy mysticism that is the abyss.

.03

Yes, indeed we are all in it. Such notion of being, i.e., words being in each other, having and doing each other, asking why and how the other is, is technocracy, the neo mysticism, the idealism (of having and doing ideas, like psychologism), the end justifying any constitutional means, (by any means necessary) archetype mythology.

As existence is truth (law) (vs lie (crime)), point-i is word (vs existence). However, while (as long as) existence is truth, death is fake. Therefore progressivism is the dichotomy existence ("law = crime" (in every sense, which is nonsense)) of hyper-idealism (the next-tier truth-lie of some future end) justifying any constitutional means necessary.

Like the rabbit hole (farce) progressivism is the holy mysticism that is the abyss.

.04

The US Constitution, or any well-considered constitution is the means justifying the end. And is not conservative or conservativism, but is what is dynamic, or life. The alternative is death.

.05

Everything is word.

Logical truth or untruth is existential logic, the logic of existing, of being there or not being there, respectively, in action. Transcending the other (word), especially oneself by "one's learning or development" until logically the ultimate wisdom emerges that both the transcended and transcending all along were nothing, or that there is only nothing to transcend to.

Because existence is the nonsense. What is (beyond words), is exactly sense as nonsense. It is the nonsense sense that ultimately and therefore all along, is the abyss.

.06

So word is not existence?

Ronald Green

That word is something or not is nonsense sense (word transcended). It is existentialist logic.

Existentialist logic is the bottomless self-similarly fractal Newtonian pit we used to call x (vs i).

The glitch of normatively and natively existing, of being in the rabbit hole is "action." Its white light summit is its lowest denominator and is mortal metastasis.

.07

word.fallacy

Ronald Green, you as a linguist should know that words are polysemous, yet you chronically hold the ambiguous middle of your endlessly dualistic magic "existence" as a strawman over, in and as the very being of people's heads. Word is something else altogether than words. It is what everything is. Note that everything is word is not that word is everything.

.08

From (the perspective of any) existence (x), word is or is not a (mere) category (subject or object), as it is in any relation to x. From x it is or is not a set or multiple, that is, of which everything is a member.

x/Word is a [mere] category/x.

x/Word is not a [mere] category./x ...

... out to practice more skateboarding.

.09

.10