Point-i | Blog / 20210323

< 0322 | 0323 | 0324 >

.01

"Everything is word" is not "word is everything."

That everything is word, is point-i.

"Everything is word" is not "word is everything."

... or anything.

The question is what something is. The questions why and how it is, is the error that word can be (explained).

"A is B" is not "A is."

.02

The informal word "existence" is common ground to the formal, normal and natural synchronic (existent) x diachronic (persistent) synthetic metrics and code of the criminally metastatic triad, the zombism Psychology (as psychobabble), the junkism, Philosophy (as twittery) and the psychoism, Psychiatry (as chaos, farce or fun).

As the synchronic and diachronic semiotically inform each other, so too the formal and informal.

.03

General Intelligence
Social
Practical
Early Developmental... i.e., resistant to change.

.04

I am the same person who gets psychiatry both

as indispensable in the assessment of individual and collective functionality (albeit the cancerous to word non-word explanation of what meaning or word is) and
as the inevitable metastasis following from it: the key draconian institution in facilitation of the new criminal organization (the psychopath techie mafia) of the clandestine perpetuation of autocratic self-organization of escalating chaos (holy nonsense) as some kind of technocratic cybernetics as if it is sacred mysticism, i.e. the true shamanism.

And, even the notion that I am having these thoughts, that they are thoughts at all, and then my thoughts, rather than that I and they are word, is exactly such cybernetics, or the metastasis of meaning that my assessment as subject (synchronic) and object (diachronic) as useful or not, is.

.05

Ronald Green

Synchronic is not static. It is as dynamic as diachronic.

Yes, I understand they are mutually interstitched by every prophession.

.06

Re. Deborah Greene and music. Music is substitute for word, since it is very close to the elimination of the bullshit that it also exists. Whether synchronic or diachronic, musical dissections are music, but music is no aggregation of synchronies or diachronies. Whatever the music is, it is the music. The idea that there are (different perspectives on it) or not, is the bullshit.