TX USA Today: Nov 21, 2024 Blog | Word | Books
20210712-SideBar edit | Calendar edit Recent Changes: Blog | Word | Books Notes & Formats. >>frame bgcolor=#303030 color=gray border=gray<< >>width=525px<< | Indent: >>width=505px margin-left=15px<< |
Quantization from quantum is an infinite leap of faith in confirmation of "existence" Euler's number is form. It is not action, e.g., indicative of so-called "function." The idea form is function, i.e., what form has or does, is the nonsense that is the mayhem. But that such consummate nonsense is the farce that is cool, hip or rad, or gucci, lit, dope or sic, or holy, is abysmal. It is the pandemic theism and metastasis, the ultimate hypocritical emergence of deep intelligence, or wisdom as standing emergency, like waves, and the abyss. Why did Dr. Faustus sell his soul? {played in the ultimate, holy farce by Dr. Fausti} Farce is holy. Dr. Fauci is the endgame of consummate enlightenment and ultimate holiness. Philosophy is only a linguistic rabbit hole as the idea that it is ontological or epistemological which is about the existence of existence of existence,... all the way down, never getting there, yet smugly (as something someone does) concluding that it does, especially in the notion that it is sense or nonsense that exists or not. As such it is unity bullshit. Language is not the problem. The idea that it has and does itself is the definition of problem. And the idea that it has and does itself presumes (in the pathology agency and action) that it exists. Of course being bonkers is existence to a degree, i.e., between unity existence and non-existence (of its potential unity constitution). Steven Lawrence Soth de Witan its when you step back and take in the big picture of reality, such as with causation, then individuation disappears. There are certain aspects of reality which are created in the act of apprehension. And it turns out to be all of them. It is perception and cognition which individuate that which isn't fragmented. And this can be not only understood, but escaped or circumnavigated. But only by letting go of the notion of self. Meaning is different from truth. Somehow it is more complex or more personal in a way. It is made up of a collection of what we take to be truths. That resonate with us. And so we are back to the notion of individual perspective and it's inherent invalidity. In that way it will always be false. Talking to Pierre is like trying to dance on quicksand. Only for the brave. |