TX USA Today: Aug 31, 2024 Blog | Word | Books
20210420-SideBar edit | Calendar edit Recent Changes: Blog | Word | Books Notes & Formats. >>frame bgcolor=#303030 color=gray border=gray<< >>width=525px<< | Indent: >>width=505px margin-left=15px<< |
Zen is not fun or funny. It is the horror. Ronald Green, I have often repeated "a point-i pushed, followed or understood (as "subject," in both senses of the word) is not point-i." In your last zoom meeting you did say to [], "Pierre does not need your help." And his home does need his help. Everything is word, including nothing, and it does not also exist or not. The idea that any word is something to be further explained than the metaphor, WHAT (analog) it is, is the awe of the question of its measure (digital as quantum or wave), or where in the spectrum of being (between everything and nothing) it stands, or what its relative perspective is, what it sees or thinks, the ontological question of its relative ignorance in terms of force, power and control: the ad hominem begging the question bullshit of word transcendence that is the mayhem. The metastatic questions WHY and HOW. That everything is quantity or quality is the bullshit that it is not word, but exists. However, in such abysmal bullshit, one cannot lie to the point that word is nothing. Therefore the holy notion that it is at most infinitesimal or nothingness, i.e., manifold aether of differential equations by integral derivative reconstruction or the infinite ocean of consciousness: hence the guru or together and His bullshit being as "mindfulness" or "woke." Zen is not fun or funny. It is the horror. +-2000 on the question was if "agency" is redundant, and later, "existence." Before that +-1992 on the question was how abysmal stupidity like artificial intelligence could so easily infiltrate everything. The answer is that it is metastasis, as intelligence is the cancer. It is the cancer "existence," namely that ontology is not only the error that everything is not word, but the abysmal error that word barely exists. If you have to, or it makes you happy, add to my name here "in my experience or opinion..." However it completely alters the meaning below. Yes, nothingness like everything is linguistic, but that it is conscious and/or unconscious is self-contradictorily language. Human or any intelligence is no less nonsense than machine intelligence. Re. the so-called miracle of Helen Keller's "consciousness." All sense is language, i.e., category and symbol, not only vision and hearing. Smell, taste and touch are language. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJN3rnWolxM Emergence of Psychotherapies in Japan -- A Jaynesian Interpretation with Dr Brian McVeigh re. 2017 book, McVeigh: |