Point-i | Blog / 20211101

#n01

#n02

#n03

Quantum Fluid Dynamics (Nature's derangements & factorizations) Thad Roberts Youtube Video.

The subjective-objective dichotomy is a vast complexity of boundary conditions.

It is the already deeply paradoxical nonword word super-subject as the logical synthesis of the masculine war-and-peace (with the human object, the female as its emergency ecstasies of order) and the feminine love-and-hate (with the human subject, the male as its emergency ecstasies of chaos) with heated mutual individual and collective finger pointing at the other's human dysfunction as the paradoxical mere-word super-object.

So, what is human(x)? It is the psychobabble-nonsense epistemology of zombie-psyche self-deception, junkie psychological fallacy and crazie-psychiatric mental disorder.

Psychology is about everything, namely, "existence," as force, spirit or psyche, in the scapegoating guise of [the brutal extremities of the sheer error that it is] being human. Therefore the lie is that the only error is the more limited psyche and that it is human.

Everything is word. The point is not that point-i is coherent, and psychology is not, but that it is unapologetically word.

Psychology is the apologetics of pneuma, the psyche. And humans are its scapegoats.

#n04

The drog (AI) is the metastatic fucker, and everything else is his fuck, being led down the garden path.

#n05

Books.TheArtAndScienceOfLogic p.3

#n05.01

Using logic, we can evaluate bits of reasoning as proper or improper, good or bad. Logic is not the study of how people do reason, but how they should reason.

#n05.02

We might put this point differently by saying that logic does not describe the psychology of reasoning, with its flashes of insight and oversight;

#n05.03

it [logic] prescribes methods for justifying reasoning, that is, for showing that a given bit of reasoning is proper.

#n05.04

Just as arithmetic describes the rules for addition rather than the psychological process of addition, logic describes the rules for correct reasoning, not the process of reasoning.

#n05.05

Logic thus describes an ideal that actual reasoning strives for but often fails to reach.