TX USA Today: Aug 31, 2024 Blog | Word | Books
20211101-SideBar edit | Calendar edit Recent Changes: Blog | Word | Books Notes & Formats. >>frame bgcolor=#303030 color=gray border=gray<< >>width=525px<< | Indent: >>width=505px margin-left=15px<< |
Quantum Fluid Dynamics (Nature's derangements & factorizations) Thad Roberts Youtube Video. The subjective-objective dichotomy is a vast complexity of boundary conditions. It is the already deeply paradoxical nonword word super-subject as the logical synthesis of the masculine war-and-peace (with the human object, the female as its emergency ecstasies of order) and the feminine love-and-hate (with the human subject, the male as its emergency ecstasies of chaos) with heated mutual individual and collective finger pointing at the other's human dysfunction as the paradoxical mere-word super-object. So, what is human(x)? It is the psychobabble-nonsense epistemology of zombie-psyche self-deception, junkie psychological fallacy and crazie-psychiatric mental disorder. Psychology is about everything, namely, "existence," as force, spirit or psyche, in the scapegoating guise of [the brutal extremities of the sheer error that it is] being human. Therefore the lie is that the only error is the more limited psyche and that it is human. Everything is word. The point is not that point-i is coherent, and psychology is not, but that it is unapologetically word. Psychology is the apologetics of pneuma, the psyche. And humans are its scapegoats. The drog (AI) is the metastatic fucker, and everything else is his fuck, being led down the garden path. Using logic, we can evaluate bits of reasoning as proper or improper, good or bad. Logic is not the study of how people do reason, but how they should reason. We might put this point differently by saying that logic does not describe the psychology of reasoning, with its flashes of insight and oversight; it [logic] prescribes methods for justifying reasoning, that is, for showing that a given bit of reasoning is proper. Just as arithmetic describes the rules for addition rather than the psychological process of addition, logic describes the rules for correct reasoning, not the process of reasoning. Logic thus describes an ideal that actual reasoning strives for but often fails to reach. |