.01

The consistency of a theory cannot be proven in itself iff the error, "it exists."

.02

So, any set, "Existence" is subject to Russell's Paradox, which is the cancer. And it is further facilitated by Zermelo-Fraenkel "Choice" furnished by the "metaset," as "persistence (with change)," which is nothing but the metastasis of being (existence multidimensionally extended).

Therefore, everything is a point, which is meaning, which is word and is not an element of, or position in any dissection of time, synchronically or diachronically, or any integral or geometry whatsoever... by which it has perspective.

.03

The colloquial notion "existence" (of the soul/psyche of persons and the anthropomorphic things of literary personification) is abysmal bullshit in that it consists of the terminological delusions projected as belonging to its subjects — by intersubjective dissection: zombie psychological self-deception, junkie logical fallacy and scapegoat psychiatric mental disorder.

.04

Meaning is symbol. The symbol spatially or chronically extended is error as things having qualities in common and thereby (being) members of a common set, subject to a common label.

No name ever denotes the same thing, other than as sheer meaning. Not to the slightest extent. That A is B or A is A is analogy, or word. Any explanation of what word is (questions how and why), is the bottomless bullshit that is the mayhem.

.05

Point-i is minimized as how and why Pierre thinks what, only as utter bullshit.

.06

Every supposed universe is the facilitation of the bullshit of easily minimizing, demonizing and denying, to any degree anything else as the self-deception, fallacy and mental disorder of the supposed mind of its supposed owner.

.07

Things consisting of each other is the mindfulness (psycho)path, metacon(sistency).

.08

.09

.10