< 1129 | 1130 | 1201 >

#n01

From the perspective* of (the idea) existence, Word is like existence.

The distinction is that Word is what everything is, and any further non-word explanation, i.e., "existence," is the nonsense that is the mayhem.

Existence is not "what everything is," namely the linguistic form that all meaning has: the A that any B is, according to the formal, normal and natural symbolic point that existence is the universal common ground. It is the error "A is." Note that even "ground" is meaning. Everything is ultimately meaning, which is the idea that everything is Word.

• Existentialist meaning (x) is incompleteness or knowledge someone has about or does in terms of, "existence".
• Point-i meaning (i) is that everything is word.

The error that is the mayhem, is the lie (the archetype mythology of the formal and informal, normal and abnormal, and natural and unnatural, i.e., in terms of self-deception, fallacy and mental disorder), the lie that humanity is anything but word, namely to mutually be faced with always now, through time — as the intersubjective field, ontology. It is the error that humans chronically critically face each other with, mutually begging the question ad hominem, although as for instance time anything is nothing but the point or synchronic dissection, existence now, or persistence as the diachronic dissection, persistence then, as the differential integrals of the nonsense constitution of sense, Existence.

The lie (x) is that something is more ultimate than meaning, which is that it is more than what it is, but needs explanations why and how it is what it is, supposedly because "it is," i.e., "exists."

(Common) ground is the metaphor for the notion that existence is primary, namely Word as the self as the contradiction and therefore self-contradiction that it is not Word but Existence, is inevitably the battle ground, whose supposedly ontological explanations are endless, and endlessly regressive.

* "Perspective"(of relative position) is relativity which is the idea "existence."

#n02

“There is ‘no such thing as truth’” is self-contradiction. “There is” = “truth.”

Worse than that. “There is” equals or sufficiently approximates the empirical ground of the commons, i.e., the formal common-ground experiential fundamentalist ground truth: “existence,” i.e., The Truth. It’s all about that.

Existence is all about belief.

#n03

Existentialism "truly" is about being freedumb congregationalists beyond the eddies within the pail.

#n04

No hypocrisy is more than the hounds of chaos simulating war.

#n05

No wizardry begins to impersonate Americana.

#n06

#n07

#n08

#n09

#n10