< 0607 | 0608 | 0609 >

#n01

The question "why" is a personal attack in the doctrine of the subject learning, remembering and believing, or to distort "human" to "function" as "psyche" measured in terms of syntactic (zombie), semantic (junkie) and pragmatic (crazie) utility in slavish servitude to whatever the collective(ist) bullshit dictates.

The new world is to the old world as metastasis is to cancer. It's the next-tier autocracy, technocracy.

To summarize the mechanics of the new age. One is like a steady blip in the new silicone+ machine, obliviously fucking up reality exponentially more than it's already been fucked up until now.

#n02

Paul James does not answer because you, Rose Simone have an answer from the arsenal provided by the oligarchs, about how despicable anyone is for daring to say such a thing. Racist, sexist, homophobe, or any such projection or other self-deception in the zombie nation.

So, yes. Paul James does not have to answer. The atrocity going down, the one in which you're a pinpoint buzz of endless verbose platitudes is making slavery or the holocaust look like a traffic violation.

#n03

OP
20210530#n04

Deborah Greene

Pierre Rousseau then what allows the metastasis and the cancer from which it allegedly forms?

In other words "'why' does it form?"

The question "why" is a personal attack in the doctrine of the subject learning, remembering and believing, or to distort "human" to "function" as "psyche" measured in terms of syntactic (zombie), semantic (junkie) and pragmatic (crazie) utility in slavish servitude to whatever the collective(ist) bullshit dictates.

The meaning self-contradiction meaning that is as if not meaning, is the cancer and metastasis, period. Its face is the then "concepts" agency and existence.

Take existence as a whole. The impossible or bullshit question in terms of itself is why "there is" something rather than nothing. Hence God. But the same applies to Him. But the error of Origin is deeper than that. It is to ask where meaning comes from.

Hence subjectivity, agency, existence.

I am not saying it conjures up meaning. The point is that the story is that meaning always has to come from somewhere else (i.e., "that is there"), if it is honest and not rife with self-deception, seduction-addiction and chaos-mental-disorder.

But it is thus riddled with deceit and self-deceit and junkism and chaos as the ecstasy.

And commodity heroically dressed up and sold as love and war.

#n04

20210607#n05

Ronald Green

Pierre Rousseau
No, it's not self-contradiction. Two similar words do not contradict themselves. And temporally, they are not the same.

Time is a word. The idea that something is spatial or temporal is bullshit. Word, the meaning that someone does not have or not, but sheer meaning is as such, period. The idea that anything exists is the bullshit of meaning also being (there) or not, namely somewhere someform, sometime at the intersection of the dissections persistence and existence.

It is as existence that things contradict themselves, having their cake and eating it. Both existing in the function or flesh and not existing in the spirit or abstract(ed) from the flesh.

Endlessly opportunistic and in terms of self-deception (zombie) fallacy (junkie) and farce (crazie).

The so-called consilient political doctrines of equality and hierarchy are the error existence, that which covers up with mask and cloak its abysmal confusion as if it is the hero's journey with ecstasies of love and war.

One word, nonsense would suffice, but given the psyche and the professional psychopaths' convenience of its lack, the words abysmal bullshit are necessary.

#n05