Point-i | Blog / 20210724

#n01

Ronald Green

No. The point is that there can be anything beyond what we can [imagine —]? imagination is NOT circular.

#n02

Ronald Green, Is the point that the questions how and why and therefore also the question what something is, are not creation, but someone creating?

#n03

Hence Wittgenstein applying the tetragrammaton to philosophy. Someone's time=space is as such, "literal." Someone else's time is not anyone else's time — as the subject-and-object, I and me, even oneself is someone else, over time.

#n04

Deborah Greene, that is why I am very concerned about the protracted delusion of ethics in psychotherapy and counseling... namely at being confronted with deep regressing of devastating circumstances, "what do I do now?"

#n05

Is "what we can" imagination not circular?

Then what about the OP: " There is a different – a big one."

#n06

To get back to the main line, Wittgenstein. Is "existence" in the more conservative, static sense (as opposed to the progressive sense just mentioned) the idea that we can say something about someone else's time?

#n07

This is why I maintain that progressivism is the deep dualistic ontological paring down of time, space and other meaning ultimately to quantum resolution as our mutual togetherness in the likeness of our respective epistemological intersubjective and intrasubjective fields (instead of the less wrong infinitesimals-integration of common ground between subjects) and even physically, beyond or other than quanta (Thad Roberts), because if the universal superfluid exists (as outer waves and inner eddies), it must consist of super-quanta, super-super-quanta, etc.

#n08

No matter how (or why) form is what it is, it is not existence. It is meaning, which is word.

#n09

re #n07 above, quantum regression as if it is ontological/ epistemological/ existence. Thad Robert's quantum space theory is about the infinite regress in terms of ever higher physical resolution (ever smaller down to the Planck-resolution quantum) consisting of super and super super liquid space, etc., which then folds back one or two levels as foundational or coherent. Well, such infinite regress is in all directions centered in any (kind of) point of meaning, "physical" or "metaphysical", or "abstract." So, the nonsense that it is consistent or persistent (or has any quality) cannot be but explained as human wannabe-wishing and wanting for the idea that it exists and is in action.

20210801#n03

#n10

Which is nonsense, super nonsense and super super nonsense.

#n11

Such regression of nonsense parades as the so-called "psyche."

The point is that "the psyche" transcends "the soul" like metastasis transcends cancer.