Point-i | Blog / 20211122

#n01

Normal and natural truth and validity, and reasoning and logic are based on the absolute self-contradiction and error, and bad logic, "existence."

The error existence includes non-existence universally in every authoritarian regime of fear-mongering at every level.

Longer commentary or quote
p.	Book Statements	1st Comment
2	Correct (good) reasoning requires logic.	Force by pneuma (spirit, soul or psyche — outside or inside — is the error that is the mayhem). The error is mind and action, i.e., reasoning.
The error is word as the idea that everything is not word, but even as all concepts are in terms of words, that some nonword explains word, which is the fundamental contradiction that all fundamentalist bigotry is, which ASL and society at large validate as only bad [human] argument.
2	There were seriously flawed arguments that led to the horrific wars of the 20th century.	All atrocity is the runaway escalation of reciprocating human scapegoating in terms of the other, and the farcical paradox that realizing subjectivity in oneself is objective. Therefore a good sense of humor on the basis of the holiness of farce.
The other includes the self: as both subject and object. The nonword supposedly to explain word is "existence." Existence is the error by which existential and universal human scapegoating are the foundational logic of all argument.
The point is not existence and the subject-agent, and what constitutes existence and action on the basis on the quality of its reasoning (language), but logic itself, which is word.
2	Logic is the study of good reasoning.	Normal (bad) logic is the question, "what is good reasoning?"
Good logic is that everything is word. Logic is bad in any form of the idea that "existence" explains word, or that word is not what everything is, but must be explained further than that everything (also word) is word.
2	"Reasoning well is more than an academic exercise. "Gathering information, making decisions, and carrying out plans all require reasoning. "Good reasoning tends to lead to accurate information, good decisions, and appropriate plans, whereas bad reasoning tends to lead to inaccuracies, bad decisions, and misguided plans."
The last paragraph above is problematic. The question is what the equivalents are of information, decisions and plans if everything is word and the idea of action (doing or having) is error.