< 0805 | 0806 | 0807 >

#n01

20210805#n02

Roger Lundström

Really?.. I think I want to know exactly how you mean it is so, because I must have missed out on something here?

I am not the point. I don't mean anything or not, but the word "science," where it is used as political rhetoric, also by so-called scientists themselves, who to themselves precariously are the point, those funded by the new criminal organization or mafia—progressivism—is further confirmation of (and as) the abductive crap humanity is being indoctrinated with.

#n02

The error is existence and action, i.e., force, power and control and the bullshit of who or what has it.

In the book Through the Looking Glass by Lewis Carroll, Humpty Dumpty claims the individual ought to determine the meaning of their own name, e.g., "social justice" or "black lives matter," as the regressively paradoxical question which is the master of the other, the person or the language.

An example of social justice as abysmally duplicitous seduction in the new Democrat plantation of all people together, is that the individual is "empowered" to pathetically claim their own name by personal pronoun, in other words to do so by the word metastasis of deep state (meta) linguistic "power."

#n03

Soth de Witan

If people and things don't exist and there is only word, why would it matter what the meaning is?...Or is meaning, attributed to 'existence' of any kind, the error? There is no meaning and it doesn't matter?

#n03.01

The point is not that people and things do not exist.

Exactly not.

#n03.02

The notion "existence" is the bullshit that people and things exist or not, i.e., are there or not.

#n03.03

It is also the bullshit that people and things are incomplete, and ontologically or epistemologically driven by their incompleteness.

#n04

The only question is what something is. The question why or how it is, is the bullshit.

#n04.01

Soth de Witan

I don't understand how one might be critical of the social justice revolution and globalism without questioning the actions and motives of those who promote those ideas.

#n04.02

How to approach the problem implies why and is the error of intersubjective reciprocity necessarily punctuated with brutal punishment and war as if it is holy.

#n04.03

Progressivism is the intersubjective field of intersectional shaming, cancellation and abject patronization on the global plantation.

#n04.04

Intersectionality is far worse a deep paradoxical relativity of force, power and control than mere human relationships.

#n04.05

Progressivism is cybernetics, i.e., organization by any means necessary, or criminal self-organization.

#n05

The Questions Why and How are The Abyss*. ... 20210804#n02.01
Nothingness of profit, as if it is holy transcendence..., whatever it is, confirms itself like rock as the endlessly regressively abysmal ad hominem questions between two extremes of humans mutually judging each other's soul or psyche with invectives like spirit and demon, as if it is the golden middle, the questions why and how.

* The Abyss, The Heart of Darkness, The Apocalypse Now.

#n06

#n07

#n08

#n09

#n10