TX USA Today: Nov 21, 2024 Blog | Word | Books
20210123-SideBar edit | Calendar edit Recent Changes: Blog | Word | Books Notes & Formats. >>frame bgcolor=#303030 color=gray border=gray<< >>width=525px<< | Indent: >>width=505px margin-left=15px<< |
McVeigh Meetup Tomorrow Sunday, January 24, 2021 The problem is the subject (promoted) as existence or ontology, namely words like "psychology+history," "changes" and "perspectives." Prototypical Problem. Metaphors and language, on the other hand, are more point-i. Things are what they are, i.e., the point that they are what they are. They are anthropic. They are nothing but word. For as soon as word (or anthropy) is the contradiction non-word, namely anything but word, it is the synthesis, intelligence, agency and presumption (narcissismus). Narcissismus is fundamentally the abyss of the tragicomic farce to be or not to be. Prototypical Fundamentalism. So, the more it objects that nothing is nothing, it only confirms that "the observer" or "existence" as the basis of the presumption of being in the world (to various degrees vulgarly demonized as nothing) or not, is the abyss. Form is only error (contradiction, fake) therefore "as" the non-word operational object-permanence, "existence." Existence is the prototypical fundamentalism, ontological form by for instance physics as the integration of quanta no less than infinitesimals (for quanta are necessarily subject to infinite fractal regress fundamentalism). It is such insistence that things exist but nevertheless approaches nothing that is the abyss by which we judge each other that is the mayhem. True form is point-derivative meaning, which is word. Continued tomorrow, 20210124.01. Is Jaynes' bicameral mind like Piaget's preoperational stage? If so, how and why? Is "object permanence," the basis of personal and personified stages of development, preoperational, operational and on, of the chronically intersubjective and torturous idea, "existence?" It surely is. The question is what is so egregious and metastatic about error? What is gained through its recognition? Deborah Greene Deborah Greene. Error (junkie fallacy) is only one point of the triad of mayhem, and its elite* form is philosophy. The elite form of self-as-other (zombie) deception is psychology and the elite form of insanity is psychiatry, e.g., the guru-enlightenment, mindfulness. * Elite: holy, namely whole or the sacred integral paradox in broken incompleteness. Word is not derivative whole or part, inversely complete or not, but what everything utterly is. Intelligence is narcissismus (fake i.e., "word-creation" word), but it is word. That everything is word, is truly human. That everything is word, is truly human. The problem in question is the prototypical problem derivative in the Piagetian universe of "object permanence," from which flows preoperational and operational developmental geometry and colloquialism, and it is far worse than its most abject euphemisms: disease, decay or entropy. |