|
TX USA Today: Nov 21, 2024 Blog | Word | Books
20210317-SideBar edit | Calendar edit Recent Changes: Blog | Word | Books Notes & Formats. >>frame bgcolor=#303030 color=gray border=gray<< >>width=525px<< | Indent: >>width=505px margin-left=15px<< |
Sounds like Zen Jon Paul and the part of zen it is most like is emptiness, sunyata. That's what always leads me to consider that "grasping" Word is a feeling or understanding when you look around, and every thing is language depending on language, an endless array or matrix folding back into itself with all its inconsistencies, incompleteness, etc. Its all words. This feeling, grasp or something, which is not words, inexplicable yet exquisite, is Word. ราล์ฟ โอเตล like the Tao Jon Paul yes although I am less famiar with it. I've mentioned this before but Pierre disagreed. Nevertheless, I do think it's a helpful analogy even though Word has no anologies and no knowing what it is (asking the question is already asking for trouble). But emptiness has a similar quality, questions and words are no longer there but emphasizing that it's a "feeling" almost like a confirmed suspicion. Zen mentions pointing at the moon, but in this case there is nothing to point to. I dunno.... ))
ราล์ฟ โอเตล, it's a strawman that I am saying something and that I am saying there is nothing to point to. The strawman serves to beg the question (imploring me to agree to the junkie philosophical bullshit, "agency" and "existence"), that is by the personified action of the ubiquitous existential fallacy, like God metastasized, Existence. The chaos sacralized by Eastern and Western farce alike is the idea that language is the problem as such, instead of what the very definition of problem is, namely agency or that language is spoken (like something blowing the wind—the Myth of Pneuma), that the universe in every part and on the whole is likewise pneumatic, with some driving force behind it or in it. On the question of existence, everything is like gravity. The question of the begging that is the error that is the mayhem, is to agree that there's a force behind or in it. That it is not the meaning that it is, the what it is, but some kind of holy force, power, and control. The questions, why and how. Everything is Word, for even meaninglessness, everything is meaning. All meaning is Word, but that Word is meaning or not, or meaningful or not, that it exists or not, is the contradiction that is the mayhem. The contradiction is not that things exist as opposed to not exist (the question begged for), but existence as such, yes and no, full or empty, more or less, fuller and emptier, necessarily with agency, as if to explain Word. It is the abysmal nonsense that is the abyss. The error is the circular idea that one exists or not, e.g., is an agent, points at all or not, and that Word is thereby subject to being (full or empty). And thus as the nonsense of being rendered by agency and as agency. And since one cannot point to it, the unity error: the paradox that it is full and empty as holiness. The unity zombie, junkie and mental funk of gravity as if it is more than meaning as force, power and control — (also ultimately spark to the new psychologistic global red triad criminal organization imperialism in escalating destruction of the West)— is the assumptive enlightenment that the realization of Word consequently both Zen and Tao-like as some kind of nothingness is mindfulness. Or "consciousness" as both the apparent phenomenological and the hidden noumenal somehow containing each other at the same time. Everything is word. The chaotic incompleteness is not due to some deficiency of language to convey meaning, but that existence is meaning as the self-contradiction of meaning. The abysmal error existence (agency) as if in explanation of word, namely the questions why and how, on whether things are there or not, i.e., exist or not, is the abyss. Suffering is the bs The error that is the mayhem is existence and agency as explanation of meaning as if it somehow transcends meaning. Facebook begging me to frame my posts as questions is x begging the question. Artificial intelligence via x-technocracy begging the question is the next-tier flatulence and bullshit that is the abyss. Word is not some word |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||