TX USA Today: Aug 31, 2024 Blog | Word | Books
20210915-SideBar edit | Calendar edit Recent Changes: Blog | Word | Books Notes & Formats. >>frame bgcolor=#303030 color=gray border=gray<< >>width=525px<< | Indent: >>width=505px margin-left=15px<< |
The Guardian ‘Why do they have to be brilliant?’ The problem of autism in the movies Why does anyone have to be "brilliant?" Because no one has a cooking clue what "the world" is, and supposedly brilliant people are by definition on the cutting edge of supposedly having glimpses of it and can come back and tell everyone else a good story. Neurotypical response: Read the article I have read the article. My concern is that this complexity-crap of a pretty article will be used to soil the reputation of anyone with perseveration (sic) enough to continue to question the absolute idiocy of the story of "the world" as it currently stands (supposedly observed as waves by the "intersubjective" field of "psyches"). "My view of the world" (paradoxically shorthand, "the world") is so different from yours, in terms of yours, namely that we are in the world having different views of it, that judged on my comment it seems to you that I have not read the article. Well, I have read the article, and it is the new model of what "the world" is, namely that it is the collective experience of some kind of neo-oceanic complex of psyches empowered together. And they are empowered by prostration to being pathetically human before the "brilliance" of "the world" as some kind of universal cybernetic Mind. Neurotypical response: The article.is about the portrayal of.people with ASD in movies, not about brilliance. Are you saying I am stupid for not ignoring the introductory question (by head and paragraph), as it is only click-bait? My main comment was reference to why people have been set up to not only stand in awe of brilliance, and therefore also love movies about autistic brilliance. My comment was that people prostrate themselves before the collectivist form of brilliance far more consummately than they ever have before King, God or Genius. The new normal that the article colludes in, is being a character fully fledged in complexity as if it is not the new complex of chronically personifying with the new totalitarian and dictatorially criminal psychopath humor (BS) that the oceanic field of "progress together" is. The answer is very simple. Hero and villain stories have always been the error and is the error. Autism and every other mental disorder is a function of the error, "function." As the error of understanding “the world” virtually no one understands that. They are not prepared to even begin to consider the idea that so-called complexity is a collective complex of defining humans in terms of conformation to the common norm (and nature) that "the world" is it, namely “existence.” Yet, such “existence” is as utterly hidden as the last infinitesimal of Zeno's Paradox is 100% incomplete. The single individual experience always at this moment as virtually infinitesimal in relation to the virtual infinity, “existence” is absolute nonsense. The new myth is that such paradoxical world is a wave-field of intersubjective psyches, whether functional or not, in terms of the so-called "human" self-deception (the psyche), fallacy (psychology) and mental disorder (psychiatry) pathetically incompletely trying to creatively make sense of it as a whole, namely as the intersubjective projection of all spatial existence by persistence over time. A Summary Why does anyone have to be "brilliant?" Because no one has a cooking clue what "the world" is, and supposedly brilliant people are by definition on the cutting edge of supposedly having glimpses of it and can come back and tell everyone else a good story. No? Are you saying I am stupid for not ignoring the introductory question (by head and paragraph), as it is only mainstream media click-bait? The point is why people have been set up to not only stand in awe of brilliance, and therefore also love movies about autistic brilliance. It is that people prostrate themselves before the collectivist form of brilliance far more consummately than they ever have before King, God or Genius. The new normal that the article colludes in, is to be a character fully fledged in brilliant complexity as if it is not the new complex of chronically personifying with the new totalitarian and dictatorially criminal psychopath humor (BS), namely the oceanic field of "the empowered psyche going forward together." The mainstream media is not news. All things equal, affirmative mass migration could reduce relative baby boomer cost. Problem is all things are not equal. Ceteris paribus ontology is not mere crap, it is zombie, junkie and crazie crap. Ceteris paribus ontology is the zombie self-deception "the psyche," the junkie logical fallacy, "psychology" and last but not least the crazie mental disorder, "psychiatry." That normal or natural is the abysmal mayhem is not clear in the sense that things, whether they exist or not, are freely interchangeable so as to endlessly rhetorically slip between, "knowledge of reality" and "reality." |