Point-i | Blog / 20210820

#n01

20210819#n01

Thad, wouldn't it be impossible to measure the friction in the superfluid, because it is that small, that is if "there is" any?

The point of the question is, if the friction of the superfluid is zero, the notion "existence" is error.

Thad

In a superfluid friction would be the measure of break in superfluidity.

Can you quieten my concern that you are not by that exact normal and natural intuition-by-indoctrination, overcoming concerns raised by Zeno and Gödel about the normalized and naturalized doctrine that the world necessarily dynamically exists?

With break in the superfluid, that is, without absolute superfluidity, the figure eight knot is still like concentric Ptolemic circles, albeit in the slightest AND greatest way yet: by the most sophisticated force-rhetoric yet to obtain the most simple(truism) of motion.

In Roberts, vs. Leibniz and Einstein, the rule (lawline) abduction (rule→case→result↰rule) is intuitively between the regressive constructs of exponential dimensions and super-quantum fractalization or the context (most abstract) as the text (most real) as if it is the world, which is more than ever before like thought, experience or phenomenal empiricism. Everything is the text, yet the intuition as never before magically persists for it is more unlikely (further regressed) than ever before, that it is what someone, or something as if someone (for it is what it most basically consists of), has and does.

If such most simple explanation is most like thought, the answer is the most holy paradox or bias than ever before, most confirmed as joy, for then it is also more magnificently than ever before not thought, but most fundamentally action.

Maybe you should sleep over it, instead of locking in an answer.

#n02

Thinking about #n01 a little more:

If the universe is a superfluid (without friction), it is absolutely certainly not existence, for then the idea force is nonsense but if it is not a superfluid, i.e., by very small friction (breaks in superfluidity), it is nearly infinitely indefinable, i.e., nearly infinitely certainly not existence.

It would then take something like near-infinite further construct like dimensions or fractal quantum regression to confirm it, i.e., it would take mystic fundamentalism or bias (magnificent magic) approaching infinity.

#n03

The conservative concern

A plan so evil, so all-encompassing, so devious, that ordinary folk were unable to comprehend its depth or intention, not because they were stupid, but because their hearts and minds were virtuous and incapable of entertaining the idea that such depravity was even possible...

Such depravity is indeed not possible as anything orderly, like a "plan." It is more than the swamp. It is the abyss.

Totalitarianism is not a plan or control. It is the paradoxical lawline (ecstatically holy chaos) by mutual indoctrination abduction.

Traditional Jewish pilpul and Jesuit casuistry are similar, only far more simple than the next-tier metastatic rhetoric currently gushing forth as if it is transcendent morality.