#n01

That anyone or anything uses words, or makes, has, uses or does anything at all, is the bullshit "existence."

"Existence" is the gamut of life and death to which people are deemed to have it, namely hierarchy. It is the nonword word that is the word-subverting cancer that now, as proudly red communist social justice empowerment is equality only as utter mendacity, for it is the ultimate top-down force, power and control of totalitarianism in annihilation of word by metastasis.

Consciousness, mind, agency, existence and ontology are the presumptuous nonword word, "x" which is word as the human or anthropomorphic subject, subjectively objectified as the 1) self-deception, 2) fallacy and 3) mental disorder of the other (especially tearfully of oneself, "me") which are the holy paradoxical deception(1), rationalism(2) and mental order(3) respectively, that are the narcissistic ego "I" as one, or "us" as group that is the tyranny.

#n01.01

Soth de Witan

....and yet, you seem worried about the state of the world. If no-one is doing anything, what can be done to rectify matters, and from where does the cause of difficulties arise?

Not in the least is it true that am I worried about the state of the world. The unity error of that statement reflects the OP (word) perfectly.

The error agency is the error existence.

#n01.02

Soth de Witan

There is trouble. No-one is responsible?

#n01.03

"The cause" is nonword word vernacular itself as the construct "reality" itself, namely the meaning of mutual projection of causes.

#n01.04

It is no cause. It is nonword word as if it is holy, but it is non-meaning (like nothingness is the ultimate reality), which is not whole, but nothing (in terms of itself, nothing but hole).

#n01.05

The idea Existence is the perfect cancer. It is word as self-contradiction.

#n01.06

That Existence "works" (exists) by evolutionary synthesis is abysmal rationalization of the idea Existence. That Existence works is the self-contradiction that is the cancer.

#n01.07

"There is trouble. No-one is responsible?"

Soth de Witan (#n01.02)

The idea that someone is responsible or not is the holy unholy construct, ages deep. So point-i is not the idea that someone is NOT responsible, no more than that they are. It is not about what things are doing (relative to each other), but that such endless complexity of operational relations and relativity are exactly what the error Existence is.

#n02

Psychological, philosophical or psychiatric wisdom is the epitome of cluster-bullshit

Psychology, philosophy and psychiatry are the emolithic trigonometry of clustering nonsense.

The psyche is like the soul or mind a terribly vacuous figment of faith.

Sophistry with love is the incremental subversion of word until its denial invariably in terms of nothing but itself is ultimate... its self-contradiction as the infinitely subjective token for cognitive incompleteness.

#n03

The metastatic abyss Progressivism derives in the abysmal error that things evolve.

#n04 from #n02

Existence as the nonsense of ontological dualism (meaning + existence), and ultimately (as if it is being enlightened or woke) as the intersubjective field of being full of holes (subjective and subject),...

... such Existence in the guise of ultimate empowerment is not ultimately woke or meta-meaning, deep state.

It is word-not-as-word, that is, not as word but as the world, namely, word riddled metastatic until it is utter nonsense.

#n05

Spinoza

"IF men’s minds were as easily controlled as their tongues, every king would sit safely on his throne, and government by compulsion would cease; for every subject would shape his life according to the intentions of his rulers, and would esteem a thing true or false, good or evil, just or unjust, in obedience to their dictates. However, we have shown already that no man’s mind can possibly lie wholly at the disposition of another, for no one can willingly transfer his natural right of free reason and judgment, or be compelled so to do. For this reason, government which attempts to control minds is accounted tyrannical, and it is considered an abuse of sovereignty and a usurpation of the rights of subjects, to seek to prescribe what shall be accepted as true, or rejected as false, or what opinions should actuate men in their worship of God. All these questions fall within a man’s natural right, which he cannot abdicate even with his own consent." Spinoza

Yes, absolutely agreed while (#n04) the bullshit Existence persists. Sense is word, also in the form "I am I," no matter how metastatic the cancer (nonsense) is that it is world.

.06

.07

.08

.09

.10