Point-i | Blog / 20210216

.01

The ontological triad, 3d fractal continuity is metastasis. 1d=error, 2d cancer.

Re. high-functioning autism, or the dogged self-similar development (pragmatism) doctrine, that one is subject to Peircean Peirce-verance and Peirce-istence.

Pierre Rousseau what do you mean?

Jon Paul

.02

So, Jon Paul, high-functioning autism is a form of bicameralism (high-functioning schizophrenia). The normal error of universal integral-derivative curvature (force) explaining word(-meaning), "existence" remains key. Jaynes. Something mostly obscured exists (unconsciously), hence is doing the work, the player, the instrument and the music, in some combination of things and relationship between things, rather than any one thing at a time.

Point-i. If nothing in particular is doing the work, other than as emergency meaning explanation in terms of the questions how and why, nothing is doing the work. It is all word. The ideas energy, force, work, control, of existing in spacetime are all nonsense or unity redundancy.

Pierre Rousseau this is pretty condensed. Can you parse it out for me?

Jon Paul

Modern day civilization as high-functioning autism, a new diagnostic realization precipitated post brushing shoulders with the psychologists at the Jaynes group, is brilliant.
Modern day civilization as high-functioning autism, a new diagnostic realization precipitated post brushing shoulders with the psychologists at the Jaynes group, is brilliant.

Every kind of mental disorder is normal (and natural), not only autism.

... in the functional to dysfunctional spectrum that is.

Jon Paul, this started years ago when I realized that we do not have free will, but if so the question of determinism vs free will is nonsense. Both stories, that everything is deterministic and that it pops out of the blue, partly or completely do not resolve to either free will or stochasticism of something happening. We have no control over what emerges, except as the convention that we are in action, thinking. It is pure convention (archetype mythology). So, we do not have volition at all. The story that we exist is sheer metaphysics... questions how and why, instead of the question what it is (the latter even less function-pragmatic [not at all] than Jaynesian metaphor, which is that language somehow carries the day).

The other point is that not only as time is everything a point (re. now). Everything is a point. Therefore point-i is that identity (everything) is word. It is not that God cannot be explained, or existence as such. Explanation of word is nonsense already.

Psychologism (psychology, philosophy and psychiatry) is a symptom of the myriad archetype error that something blows the wind, or is behind gravity, i.e., force embodiment and force.

.03

.04

The semiotician Charles Peirce could reportedly write with both hands simultaneously. It is told that sometimes in lectures he would stand in front of a black board writing a mathematical problem with his left hand and at the same time the solution with his right hand. Peircean pragmatism (as the Peirce-sense itself) is the playful notion of resolution that knowledge unfolds new landscapes (fields: lines, planes and volumes... especially the latter) indefinitely. Peircean pragmatism is more precisely the sense that something is happening, as one persists, to make one amazingly develop.

The counterargument here is often that mental disorder is real and that psych professionals provide invaluable service to the community. Not so. Those supposedly born with autism and other mental disorders are derivatives of the abominably crap (psycho) logic they are born into, and by which they pragmatically proceed on anything but their own volition.

.05

The point is that any psychiatric "diagnosis" such as autism is bullshit. It has a functional equivalent, and it is always rife with reams of bigoted confirmation self-deception, fallacy and other doctrines of functional mental disorders shored up by (ontological!) fields between it and the truly peripheral dysfunctional (scapegoat) mental disorders.

.06

A person is one who exists in and consists of such fields, between being nothing and everything a.k.a. the intersubjective fields of psychoanalysis.

.07

Of course normalized or naturalized nature is such that its first impulse-drive is to dismiss the above as its supposed abnormal author-as-normal having some concoction of the same... on the far end of the spectrum.

.08

The world is nothing but sense, which is meaning, which is word. Everything is word. The idea that sense signifies something more than word, to the point that word is mere token for it, standing for whatever "exists-or-not" to the extent that it does (exist..) AND that it (existence) is holy, is the abyss. It is in the nonsense (trance dance) construct and fabric of fields of vision "being" beyond word that such bullshit maintains, as that what is at fault is human fallibility, ignorance and immorality.

So-called chaos is nothing but the relentlessly pragmatic bullshit that "the world" exists-or-not.

I.e. the fractal regression posing as progress woke: face, fece and psyche.

Bullshit or nonsense. Trance dance.

.09

The 13th, 3 days ago.

What is the question. The questions how and why are its cancer.

20210213.01

Yes in so many cases the questions themselves are more powerful than the answers. Asking "what" predisposed a functional answer. Asking "why" or "how" predisposed a conjectural answer. It's important to match the question to the context of the kind of answer you want. "What" primes for solution (convergent thought). "Why" and "how" prime for possibilities (divergent thought).

Jon Paul

That "what" predisposes a functional answer is only as the "what" in (archetyping being "in" and other prepositions) "what is [always fraught with the paradoxical dualism, 'what is not',"] but not as the what that everything is, namely, "what something is."

Yes. "What is" (ontology) has an inside. It is content of character predisposition, e.g., the endlessly extensional, intensional and entensional pragmatic malignant presumptuousness of id, ego and superego. Including the contextual or divergent questions "why" and "how" also supposedly "exist [or not]" of looking into the abyss. And then returns as Big Brother, looking back into you, you the text (word explained).

Power. The error is force, power and control. Usurpation word of word as if it is holy (powerful questions) is contextually integral ontological extension of all sort and is not the unity infinite enlightenment ocean but the cancer, the abyss. And its ultimate name is "woke."