Point-i | Blog / 20210723

#n01

←20210721#n01

Time is a dimension directly interchangeable with space dimension. Nevertheless now things are "woke" and our subjectivity has a life of its own. The hole of yonder (beyond the point) is holy as never before. "We now have" bottomless nonsense parading as sense, the "function" of "the metaphor" by which one time dimension is consistently interchangeable with three space dimensions.

The hidden (explained away as the psyche — the zombie, junkie and crazie human nature) implication is that normal or natural (and it is unusual bullshit) now has two time dimensions, i.e., TIME AS A PLANE coinciding with a geometry of three dimensions of three-dimensional spaces (9d or 2t). Three time dimensions.... (27d or 3t).

The idea entention, that words are iconic sign, indexical reference or symbolic encyclopedia (memory) is that the meaning words "have" as they "carry" (-phor) meaning is somewhere other in terms of normal spacetime than in the word. In other words, that things have entention is the idea that all "meaning" is merely semiotic.

The truly next-tier (confirmation-fundamentalistic) Descartian dualism of the intersubjective field of insanity persisting confirmed by its own neo-classical insanity is the metastatic backwards bending or folding prostration (the temporal plane as the playing field 2t or intersubjective field 3t) to the universe of the subject in action (the old cancer) that "together" (intersubjectively) verb is not noun, self-organizing is not self-organization, imagining is not imagination, intending is not intention, or entending is not entention.

#n02

It is as if Thad Roberts is afraid to consider specific detail of his ontological theorizing as wrong, as he does not like even the potential of making someone else look bad (especially his own theory and therefore himself) so he vaguely says he does not understand "what I'm saying" or why I do what I do... so, to free himself of it, free to do his own work-in-a-bubble, he generally leaves the age-old f-question about "the soul" to the new, next-tier experts on "the psyche."

#n03

"Imagination is the impossibility of imagining what we can’t."

The crux is that everything is sense. The idea that something other than sense informs sense (like the Kantian noumenon, or "existence," therefore "agency" or "surprise," like the 2t derivative "jerk" in general) is the error. It is the same error as the idea that gravity is a force or that something else causes it, as the force. Or that everything is always in action by virtue of some force behind it, hidden, "at work."

#n04

"Can we create literature beyond thoughts that cannot be thought?"

It is not even that we cannot. The very idea of the world explained as us or anything doing something or not is the fuckery of the soul and the psyche.

#n05

That anything is within or beyond can or ken or not is the circular, paradoxical nonsense.

#n06

It is what it is. Word. What is, namely why or what is, is creationism, i.e., beyond-word nonsense.