< 1028 | 1029 | 1030 >

#n01

Existence and Ontology are the Error, Psychology

Word (what everything is) as itself also anything not word (not itself), is error x (existence), which is utterly psychological.

#n01.01

Inherent connection is also psychological, i.e., in terms of the ontologically incorporeal spirit, soul, psyche or anima (pneuma or force) fundamentally supposedly driving words or thereby, senses (as if not words), as the physical or as language.

#n01.02

The narcissismus that the-error-existence (x) is, is politics ultimately as the totalitarian autocratic globalist drive for the functional "incorporation" of every line on every level into the holistic whole, which thereby can be seductively holy, namely the unspeakable “nothing” as “everything.”

#n01.03

X is narcissismus with the word-transcendence of existence as everything, i.e., as the sacredly esoteric mysticism for authority.

#n01.04

Transcendence is the anima of wonder, as the sexual synthesis (the duplicitous dualistic or triunistic intelligence, semiotics) of awe (awesome or awful)

#n01.05

1. the feminine ecstasy of love essentially confirmed as underscored by the synthesis of chaotic bliss
2. the masculine ecstasy of war essentially confirmed as underscored by the synthesis of orderly bliss

#n01.06

Love (1) is the facilitation of chaos as the awe of wondering at things and war (2) is facilitation of order as the awe of wondering about things. Together they are the infinitely dimensional (or fractally regressive quantum) geometries of emergence, the bullshit-magical memetics, existence.

#n01.07

Memetics is obfuscation of the idea that what is the nonword word self-contradiction, “existence” is the cancer, “word-transcendence.” It is the idea that existence is holy and ideas (words, mere subjects or objects in existence) are viruses.

#n01.08

Point-i is the point that from any perspective, i.e., of any geometry of the error existence itself, everything is point-identity now, which is word. And therefore, the point that word is subject to being there or not and therefore subject to the idea that it is everything or the holiness nothing is nonsense.

#n01.09

For instance, the word, "gravity." It is error as force, agency and existence.

#n01.10

Soth de Witan

I find it [point-i] confusing. I guess it's my resistance to what is being stated, although the ideas are expressed with utmost clarity, at the same time, they hit me like a jumble of word-salad.

#n01.11

The clarity is deductive logic, the word-salad is the inductive logic of the commons of the known, i.e., psychology, ontology, epistemology and ultimately the holy-farcical abyss, existence.

#n02

#n03

#n04

#n05

#n06

#n07

#n08