.01

Soth de Witan

Word just is? No questions to be asked or answered? The meaning is in the word?

No. Those questions are psychological projection in the sense that the cybernetics now rife is a world containing things as its elements anthropomorphically personified (having soul/psyche/spirit) to endlessly opportunistically be (in action or not) or not.

The ground error that is the origin of the abysmal formal geometry that all informal colloquialisms are based on and the very definition of dissociated ground as begging the question fallacy and murderous battle (ultimately as snowflakes with oneself, blissfully fused together) are the error that something-(just)is, namely that it exists or not.

"Word (just) is," again is the error existence and persistence as non-word word, namely with existence as the item of faith so utterly blind, it most collectively-narcissistically sees, whether things do or have each other (reciprocally themselves also) by consistency or not. That anything just is, is the error existence. Gödel's incompleteness theorems are utter proof that existence is a lie for the idea existence can never be conclusive other than as virtually (multidimensionally) infinitesimal homuncular holiness, or the sacredly prepositional chaotic order of subject enslavement. No matter how many questions why or how, such questions ultimately do not escape the utterly regressive mystification and facilitation of the bullshit that something just is, namely that it exists.

It is not that meaning is in word, if the sense is the nonsense that word just is ("A is," i.e., exists, as if beyond word, vs "A is B," i.e., idea or word) and therefore that the implication of the question, "no questions to be asked or answered" is that it is someone's word, namely word's word... that word is self-organized (whether by its order or its chaos), it exists. That anything just is, is the error existence, at least as the music doing itself, for if the fundamental idea is the dichotomy that it exists or not, it is at least self-organization implied and therefore agency implied. The question what something is, is not the error existence. It is word. The questions why and how it is, are the error existence.

.02

.03

.04

.05

.06

.07

.08

.09

.10