Recent Changes - Search:

TX USA Today: Aug 31, 2024 Blog | Word | Books   

2020-12-31 2021 2022-01-01
January February March
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
31 01 02 01 02 03 04 05 06 01 02 03 04 05 06
03 04 05 06 07 08 09 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 07 08 09 10 11 12 13
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 28 29 30 31
31
April May June
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
01 02 03 01 01 02 03 04 05
04 05 06 07 08 09 10 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
25 26 27 28 29 30 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 27 28 29 30
30 31
July August September
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
01 02 03 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 01 02 03 04
04 05 06 07 08 09 10 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30
October November December
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
01 02 01 02 03 04 05 06 01 02 03 04
03 04 05 06 07 08 09 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 26 27 28 29 30 31 01
31

20210721-SideBar edit  | Calendar edit  


Recent Changes: Blog | Word | Books



Main sidebar edit  

Notes & Formats.


>>frame bgcolor=#303030 color=gray border=gray<<

>>width=525px<< | Indent: >>width=505px margin-left=15px<<

< 0720 | 0721 | 0722 >


#n01

Ronald Green

There is a difference between imagining and imagination.

John Lennon’s “Imagine” was not about imagination but about imagining. There is a different – a big one. Imagining is about what could be if we wanted it (“if we tried”), while imagination is ostensibly about ‘thinking beyond’. Only the former is possible.

Attn. Thad Roberts, see the different(!)Freudian-slip(?) between imagining and imagination, the OP.

Physics resolves all the way down, and is no infinite regress, but ends in the quantum, a measure in terms of only two minimum Planck-units or three maximum Planck units that the minima represent. The quantum albeit the smallest possible quale in any physical terms whatsoever, of persistence or consistence, it is like everything that is something, not "what is," (as if beyond meaning) but is meaning.

Incredible the propaganda. "You can be whatever you wannabe" rooting in the hyper-bullshit, "we may be whatever we wannabe [together]."

Self and other are not in spacetime or not. You (Ronald or Thad) and I (Pierre) are not juxtaposed or diametrically opposed, or not. We are a point, whether one or together, still one, or any number of mutual points that are us, and not what we have or what have us, or not. For everything is not noun (wannabe or state) or verb (wanna-wannabe or metastate)—persistently infinite regress as if it is progress "creating" any universe. It is word.

Consciousness of consciousness is the traditional bullshit, i.e., imagination, being about having soul IN worlds beyond. Consciousness of consciousness of consciousness is the next tier bullshit, i.e., in terms of "the [collective] psyche" imagining (being psyched) becoming other worlds, together.

Verb is the new everlasting life, turtles forever, once more set in stone. Not the metaphysical stasis beyond word, e.g., the universal or pantheistic aether or buzz in confirmation of one's soul, but the physical extended as metastasis in confirmation of the ever-emergent ontological self in the intersubjective field of the collective psyche.

Artificial intelligence is The Drog or the German, trug (deception or delusion... intelligence next-tier no longer the mere cancer "epistemological intelligence," but metastasis systematically wiping out the world by the sheer duplicitous subversion of all meaning by "agentive function" as "progress" or "change"... the world: humanity. French: le monde).

20210723#n01


#n02

Have you seen what an owl looks like without feathers? Not so "cute." And one of the most prolific "predators" of rodents.

Karen Otto

That is why they are so important to the farming communities. Excellent for rodent control. Snakes as well.

Then the point is not that it is a baby breaking motherly hearts, but that it is an owl.

It follows that if rodent bait has to be put out, it must be owl proof.

'n Boer maak 'n plan.

Karen Otto

Not everyone thinks though

They don't think because their brains are full of social justice twittery.

20210722#n01


#n03


#n04


#n05


#n06


#n07


#n08


#n09


#n10


#n11


#n12



Edit - History - Print - Recent Changes - Search
Page last modified on November 02, 2021, at 10:22 AM