< 1202 | 1203 | 1204 >

More about "shifting gears" on this page... the structure of fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder is most relevant. It is x if it is x and non-x if it is non-x. X is the idea existence, i.e., plus or minus: existence/non-existence. The error is holonism, or existence as the whole in terms of its parts. Therefore the error is ultimately complete, and the further it goes, the worse it gets IN TERMS OF ITSELF. Therefore next-tier development progressivism with autocratic wizardry is by definition the epic or archetype mythological consummation of the abyss, i.e., existence as utter metastasis.

#n01.01

The progressivist argument is next-tier passionate rationalization in terms of Jaynesian emotion. And that point is not argument. It is point-i.

#n01.02

#n01.03

Is progressivism the abolishment of the ego, I?

#n01.03

If so, it is anything but clear, rather the opposite, given the massively escalating metaverse of fake mainstream media, personal media and advertising media transporting the ego to heights of executive function never reached before (but it is not impossible).

#n01.04

#n01.05

The epic of Gilgamesh is explicitly the bullshit that executive function is, meant for the one (explained in terms of his fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder) who needs to see deep and thereby surpass all other kings. The ego, I.

#n01.06

Point-i is not an attack on anyone or anything. It is the point that executive function is self-contradictory non word [word], i.e., what all bullshit is, or pneumatics derived in pneuma.

#n01.07

#n01.08

Only if the point is that someone is doing it, is the question of what anything is, x. The question whether the path is leading to point-i is no such thing if word, i.e., non word word word, etc., not word non word. Everything is word, period.

#n01.09

=Word non word [word]. Not implication. Simply what everything is.

#n01.09

"Word non word" is no sign. It is word.

#n01.10

As soon as the story is that this or that point was about something, namely sign, rather that it is word, voila, x.

#n01.13

re. #n01.09 "Not implication" = explicit or implicit.

#n01.14

"Shifting gears is what some agent does" is not necessarily qualification of meaning. It is only qualification of meaning if it is non word. Only "then" is it "explicit" or "implicit," namely "shifting gears."

#n01.16

So, the spiral dynamics spiral is non word. Period. The "word" qualification is semiotic bullshit. Everything is word. Not even already. It just is.

#n01.17

Non word is the dualistic shiftiness or the epic of fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder, i.e., dynamics, spiral or not.

#n01.18

#n02

#n03

#n04

#n05

#n06

#n07

#n08