Point-i | Blog / 20210923

#n01

Isn't it obvious why the commercial value is off the charts? It's about the error existence and agency, namely force, power and control.

Pierre Rousseau, there's the subjective measure of that point, do you like it, or not?

That subjective measure uses color to rate quality.

#n01.01

"Subjective" and "subject" presume agency, which is the cloak and diversion from the error, and the facilitation of the error.

#n01.02

What is the error? The error is that someone or something is not only a point of meaning but does or has points of meaning, and is thus mystically part of a world beyond meaning, namely they exist. The error manifests here as the matter of my doing and having in the context of being the point, to be done or had, as the question of whether I like it or not, as its subject-and-object(slave) next-tier. In the universal sense of people being monitored as utility quotients.

#n01.03

This argument is not about me alone, so I am not whining. I'm an example here of the error as it applies to everyone, as both subject and object.

#n01.04

It is not clear what sense is other than that it is anything true to the point that everything is word. The holy farce(noise) of the nonsense "existence" in any of its forms (whenever language but implies a world beyond word) as the minimization, demonization and denial of word, as if itself is transcendent, is the preclusion of meaning.

#n02

The point of all points is that everything is word, but any idea that word is something, everything or anything, is the nonsense of the questions why and how it exists, for it is the notion that something other than word explains word. The idea that anything is holy, is the self-contradiction sacralized as paradox, e.g., yin yang of being a whole and a hole, that both holonism and holism are.

#n03

re. 20210921#n12

Physix is next-tier bullshit.

Pierre Rousseau Physix is simply pictures of objective reality. You bring the words. The words you bring are pretty opaque.

Don't you want people to understand you?

#n03.01

"Simply pictures" and "objective reality" are words. But they are very special kinds of words. They are words as if they are not word.

#n03.02

As for what I do and how or why I do it, those are examples of more of the same nonsense, namely the institution of blaming humans for the mayhem that it itself is.

#n03.03

The wordy litany of fallacies, self-deceptions and mental disorders is a setup of humans being made scapegoat for the mess, and thereby is itself the mess. [The worst curse words are lame euphemism for the abysmal error that it is.]

#n03.04

For instance the idea that "what someone brings" is opaque, precludes any question for clarification. It as the error of the world as a system in action (cybernetics) suggestion that such a someone is showing signs, and may have to be pegged down as having some mental disorder.

#n03.05

The Peircean semiotic triad is the icon (picture) the index (indication) and symbol (value token).

#n03.06

The point is that everything is symbol, also icon and index. Everything is word.