< 0529 | 0530 | 0531 >

#n01

Pierre Rousseau everything is word is your premise and agenda. I'm not on board with this premise and its discussion.

The connection to Jaynes is he was troubled by Jconsciousness, as the last chapter of his book shows. He would be even more troubled by the escalating positing of an abysmally choking inner-field hyper fundamentalism like a quantum-white sheet of death cloaking and facilitating the metastasis of all meaning as the so-called world.

If ontology and epistemology no one knows anything but as word. The myth that it is other than word is in terms of more words, particularly words of the psychological self-deception, fallacy and mental disorder of THE OTHER (especially oneself), words of esoteric nonsense like spirit, soul, psyche and mind.

#n02

Apparently your concern is not about where you go but is the new social prerogative that I'm not on board—where I am conveniently minimized as token for denial of a concern Jaynes shared in the last paragraph of his book, about the analog I.

Jaynes himself seems to have considered that Jaynes consciousness is a cultural construct consisting of troubling phenomena by which humans are at every level set up for psychological suffering.

#n03

Hence the business of your discovery and belief how delusional man is. Nothing is more consummately bullshit.

#n04

That a thing means something is the error and bullshit that it is not meaning.

#n04.01

Bullshit is not meaning?

Deborah

20210531#n03

#n05